Analyzing Laissez-faire Leadership Assertion and Reason

This question asks to evaluate the correctness of two statements about laissez-faire leadership.

Assertion (A) Analysis: Laissez-faire and Group Outcomes

• Laissez-faire leadership is defined by a hands-off approach, granting significant autonomy to group members.
• High autonomy can lead to increased job satisfaction among members who feel trusted and empowered.
• However, the lack of direct guidance and clear direction often results in decreased efficiency and productivity.
• Therefore, the assertion that laissez-faire leadership results in a satisfied but inefficient group is considered correct.

Reason (R) Analysis: Decision-Making in Laissez-faire

• The defining characteristic of laissez-faire leadership is delegation and minimal leader intervention, allowing the group to make decisions.
• The statement claims this style involves determining policies without consulting members. This is contrary to the laissez-faire approach.
• Leaders who set policies without consultation are typically more autocratic or directive.
• In laissez-faire, the leader essentially steps back, allowing members to decide, rather than actively deciding for them without input.
• Thus, the reason provided is incorrect as it misrepresents the decision-making process in laissez-faire leadership.

Conclusion

Based on the analysis, Assertion (A) is correct, and Reason (R) is incorrect.