Consider the following statements: 1) If p is relatively prime to each of q and r, then p is relatively prime to the product qr. 2) If p divides the product qr and if p divides q, then p must divide r.
1 only
Let's analyze the given statements concerning number theory concepts like relative primality and divisibility.
Statement 1 says: If p is relatively prime to each of q and r, then p is relatively prime to the product qr.
Two integers are relatively prime (or coprime) if their greatest common divisor (GCD) is 1. The statement can be written as:
If \( \gcd(p, q) = 1 \) and \( \gcd(p, r) = 1 \), then \( \gcd(p, qr) = 1 \).
Let's think about this. If p has no common prime factors with q, and p has no common prime factors with r, can p have any common prime factors with the product qr?
The prime factors of the product qr are simply the union of the prime factors of q and the prime factors of r.
Since p shares no prime factors with q (because \( \gcd(p, q) = 1 \)) and p shares no prime factors with r (because \( \gcd(p, r) = 1 \)), p cannot share any prime factors with the combination of prime factors of q and r, which form the prime factors of qr.
Therefore, p has no common prime factors with qr. This means their greatest common divisor is 1.
So, Statement 1 is correct.
Example:
Example where p is not prime:
Statement 2 says: If p divides the product qr and if p divides q, then p must divide r.
In mathematical notation:
If \( p | qr \) and \( p | q \), then \( p | r \).
The symbol \( p | qr \) means that qr is a multiple of p, or qr = kp for some integer k. Similarly, \( p | q \) means q = mp for some integer m.
Let's test this statement with an example. We need to find a case where \( p | qr \) and \( p | q \), but \( p \) does *not* divide \( r \).
In this example, we have \( p | qr \) and \( p | q \), but \( p \) does not divide \( r \). Therefore, Statement 2 is incorrect.
Statement 2 would be correct if p and q were relatively prime. This is a property known as Euclid's Lemma: If \( p | qr \) and \( \gcd(p, q) = 1 \), then \( p | r \). But Statement 2 does not include the condition that p and q must be relatively prime.
| Statement | Description | Correctness | Reason/Counterexample |
|---|---|---|---|
| Statement 1 | If \( \gcd(p, q) = 1 \) and \( \gcd(p, r) = 1 \), then \( \gcd(p, qr) = 1 \). | Correct | If p shares no prime factors with q and no prime factors with r, it shares no prime factors with qr. |
| Statement 2 | If \( p | qr \) and \( p | q \), then \( p | r \). | Incorrect | Counterexample: p=6, q=12, r=5. \( 6 | (12 \times 5) \) (6 | 60) and \( 6 | 12 \), but \( 6 \nmid 5 \). |
Based on our analysis, only Statement 1 is correct.
| Concept | Definition | Notation | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Divisibility | An integer a divides an integer b if b = ac for some integer c. | \( a | b \) | \( 3 | 12 \) because \( 12 = 3 \times 4 \) |
| Relatively Prime (Coprime) | Two integers a and b are relatively prime if their greatest common divisor (GCD) is 1. | \( \gcd(a, b) = 1 \) | \( \gcd(7, 10) = 1 \) |
| Greatest Common Divisor (GCD) | The largest positive integer that divides two or more integers without leaving a remainder. | \( \gcd(a, b) \) | \( \gcd(12, 18) = 6 \) |
Understanding divisibility rules and properties of relatively prime numbers is fundamental in number theory. Statement 1 is a key property used in proofs involving coprime numbers.
Statement 2 highlights the importance of the relative primality condition. The implication \( \text{If } p | qr \text{ and } p | q \text{, then } p | r \) is generally false. It holds true if \( \gcd(p, q) = 1 \). In that specific case, any factor p shares with qr must come from r because p shares no factors with q (other than 1). Our counterexample (p=6, q=12, r=5) works precisely because \( \gcd(p, q) = \gcd(6, 12) = 6 \neq 1 \). Here, the factor 6 in the product qr (which is 60) comes partly from q (which is 12, a multiple of 6) and not necessarily from r.
These concepts are essential for topics like prime factorization, modular arithmetic, and cryptography.
If I = a 2 + b2 + c 2, where a and b are consecutive integers and c = ab, then I is
How many zeros are there in the product 1 50 × 2 49 × 3 48 × .... × 50 1 ?
What is the number of digits in 2 40 ? (Given that log 10 2 = 0.301)
The number of prime numbers which are less than 100 is
What is the largest power of 10 that divides the product 29 × 28 × 27 × ...2 × 1 ?
Let m and n be natural numbers. What is the minimum value of (m + n) such that 33m + 22n is divisible by 121 ?
The total number of live births in a specific locality during different months of a specific year was obtained from the office of the Birth registrar. This set of data may be called
If log 10 6 = 0.7782 and log 10 8 = 0.9031, then what is the value of log 10 8000 + log 10 600?
If x = 111 - - - - 1 (20 digits), y = 333 - - - - 3 (10 digits) and z = 222 - - - - 2 (10 digits), then what is (x – y 2)/z equal to?
If a, b and c are positive integers such that \(\dfrac{1}{a+\dfrac{1}{b+\dfrac{1}{c+\dfrac{1}{2}}}} =\dfrac{16}{23}\) , then what is the mean of a, b and c?
Find the number of integers between $1$ and $150$ (inclusive) having $7$ as one of the digits but which are not divisible by $7$.
Integers are listed from 700 to 1000. In how many integers is the sum of the digits 10 ?
Using 2, 2, 3, 3, 3 as digits, how many distinct numbers greater than 30000 can be formed ?
Consider the following statements :
1. The sum of 5 consecutive integers can be 100.
2 The product of three consecutive natural numbers can be equal to their sum.
Which of the above statements is/are correct ?
The difference between a 2-digit number and the number obtained by interchanging the positions of the digits is 54.
Consider the following statements:
1. The sum of the two digits of the number can be determined only if the product of the two digits is known.
2. The difference between the two digits of the number can be determined.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?