Read the following passage and answer question based on it. Now what is knowledge ? Is knowledge related to intelligence ? Intelligence uses knowledge, intelligence being the capacity to think clearly, objectively, safely and healthily. Intelligence is a state in which there is no personal emotion involved, no personal opinion, prejudice or inclination. Intelligence is the capacity for direct understanding. I am afraid this is rather difficult, but it is important, it is good for you to exercise your brain. So there is knowledge, which is the past continually being added to, and there is intelligence. Intelligence is the quality of the mind that is very sensitive, very alert, very aware. Intelligence does not hold on to any particular judgement or evaluation, but is capable of thinking very clearly, objectively. Intelligence has no involvement. Are you following? Now, how is this intelligence to be cultivated? What is the capacity of this intelligence? You are living here, being educated in all the various disciplines, in various branches of knowledge. Are you also being educated so that intelligence comes into being at the same time? You cannot think clearly if you are prejudiced, if you have opinions. You cannot think clearly if you are not sensitive; sensitive to nature, sensitive to all the things that are happening around you, sensitive not only to what is happening outside you but also inside you. If you are not sensitive, if you are not aware, you cannot think clearly. Intelligence implies that you see the beauty of the earth, the beauty of the trees, the beauty of the skies, the lovely sunset, the stars, the beauty of subtlety.
A student can think clearly, if -
The question asks under what condition a student can think clearly, based on the provided passage. The passage discusses the nature of knowledge, intelligence, and the qualities required for clear thinking.
Let's examine the relevant sentences in the passage that talk about thinking clearly:
These statements clearly outline the conditions necessary or detrimental to clear thinking according to the author.
Now let's evaluate each option based on the text:
The passage states, "You cannot think clearly if you are not sensitive; sensitive to nature...". This implies that being sensitive is necessary for clear thinking. Being sensitive to nature is given as an example of this required sensitivity. Therefore, if a student is sensitive to nature, it contributes to their ability to think clearly.
The passage explicitly states, "You cannot think clearly if you are prejudiced...". This option presents the opposite of what is required. Prejudice hinders clear thinking, according to the passage.
The passage emphasizes being "sensitive, very alert, very aware". While reflection is a form of awareness, the passage does not explicitly state that a lack of reflection enables clear thinking. In fact, being sensitive and aware would likely involve some degree of reflection.
The passage links intelligence to the "capacity for direct understanding" and states intelligence involves thinking clearly. It's highly unlikely that lacking understanding would allow for clear thinking; it would most likely impede it.
Based on the direct statements in the passage, being sensitive is a prerequisite for thinking clearly, and sensitivity to nature is given as an example of this crucial quality. Therefore, the condition that allows a student to think clearly, according to the passage, is being sensitive to nature.
| Condition | Supported by Passage? | Effect on Clear Thinking (as per passage) |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitive to nature | Yes (part of being 'sensitive') | Enables clear thinking ('cannot think clearly if you are not sensitive') |
| Prejudiced | Yes | Prevents clear thinking ('cannot think clearly if you are prejudiced') |
| Not reflective | Not directly mentioned as enabling | Passage emphasizes sensitivity/awareness, which implies some reflection/awareness. |
| Not understanding | Implied no | Understanding linked to intelligence & clear thinking; lack would hinder. |
| Concept | Definition/Description in Passage | Relation to Clear Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Knowledge | The past continually being added to. | Used by intelligence. |
| Intelligence | Capacity to think clearly, objectively, safely, healthily; sensitive, alert, aware quality; capacity for direct understanding. | Crucial for clear thinking. |
| Prejudice/Opinions | Personal emotion, opinion, prejudice, inclination. | Prevents clear thinking. |
| Sensitivity/Awareness | Sensitive to nature, surroundings, internal state. | Necessary for clear thinking. |
The passage highlights sensitivity not just as an emotional state, but as an awareness of the external world (nature, surroundings) and the internal world (what is happening inside you). This broad definition of sensitivity is presented as fundamental to the capacity for clear, objective thinking. It suggests that a mind that is closed off, unaware, or preoccupied with biases (prejudice, personal opinions) cannot perceive reality accurately, thus hindering clear thought. Being sensitive allows one to gather accurate information and perceive nuances, which are essential for objective thinking.
The connection between being sensitive to nature and thinking clearly suggests that observing the natural world fosters a state of mind that is alert, aware, and free from personal bias – qualities the passage associates with intelligence and clear thinking. It implies that engaging with the objective reality of nature can cultivate the very qualities needed for clear, unbiased thought in all areas.