This problem involves understanding how a laser beam spreads out as it travels over a long distance due to diffraction. We are given the initial size of the laser beam, its wavelength, and the distance to the moon. We need to estimate the size of the beam when it returns to Earth after reflecting off the moon.
The key information provided is:
We assume the beam propagates through a vacuum and experiences ideal diffraction-limited spreading. This means the spreading is solely due to the wave nature of light and is not worsened by atmospheric effects or imperfections.
Laser beams, especially over long distances, tend to spread out. For lasers, this spreading is often modeled using the principles of Gaussian beams. The beam radius (distance from the center to the point where intensity drops to $1/e^2$ of the maximum) at a distance $z$ from the beam waist is given by:
$w(z) = w_0 \sqrt{1 + \left(\frac{z}{z_R}\right)^2}$
where:
In this problem, the initial beam diameter $d_0 = 1$ cm, so the initial radius is $w_0 = d_0/2 = 0.005$ m.
First, let's calculate the Rayleigh range ($z_R$) for this laser beam:
$z_R = \frac{\pi w_0^2}{\lambda} = \frac{\pi (0.005 \text{ m})^2}{5 \times 10^{-7} \text{ m}}$
$z_R = \frac{\pi \times 2.5 \times 10^{-5} \text{ m}^2}{5 \times 10^{-7} \text{ m}} = \frac{\pi \times 2.5}{0.05} \text{ m} = 50\pi \text{ m} \approx 157 \text{ m}$
The distance to the moon ($L \approx 3.84 \times 10^8$ m) is vastly larger than the Rayleigh range ($z_R \approx 157$ m). This means the beam is propagating deep into the far-field region ($z \gg z_R$). In this far-field region, the Gaussian beam formula simplifies significantly. The term $(z/z_R)^2$ becomes much larger than 1, so:
$w(L) \approx w_0 \sqrt{\left(\frac{L}{z_R}\right)^2} = w_0 \frac{L}{z_R}$
Substituting the expression for $z_R$ back into this equation:
$w(L) \approx w_0 \frac{L}{(\pi w_0^2 / \lambda)} = \frac{\lambda L}{\pi w_0}$
This formula shows that in the far-field, the beam radius grows linearly with distance $L$. The diameter $D(L)$ is twice the radius, $D(L) = 2w(L)$.
$D(L) \approx \frac{2 \lambda L}{\pi w_0}$
Since $w_0 = d_0/2$, we can also write this in terms of the initial diameter $d_0$:
$D(L) \approx \frac{2 \lambda L}{\pi (d_0/2)} = \frac{4 \lambda L}{\pi d_0}$
Now, let's plug in the values to calculate the estimated diameter $D(L)$ upon returning to Earth:
Using the formula $D(L) \approx \frac{4 \lambda L}{\pi d_0}$:
$D(L) \approx \frac{4 \times (5 \times 10^{-7} \text{ m}) \times (3.84 \times 10^8 \text{ m})}{\pi \times (0.01 \text{ m})}$
$D(L) \approx \frac{(20 \times 10^{-7}) \times (3.84 \times 10^8)}{\pi \times 10^{-2}} \text{ m}$
$D(L) \approx \frac{7.68 \times 10^2 \text{ m}^2}{\pi \times 10^{-2} \text{ m}} = \frac{768}{\pi \times 0.01} \text{ m}$
$D(L) \approx \frac{768}{0.0314159} \text{ m} \approx 24446 \text{ m}$
Converting the result to kilometers:
$D(L) \approx 24446 \text{ m} \times \frac{1 \text{ km}}{1000 \text{ m}} \approx 24.45 \text{ km}$
The calculated diameter of the laser beam upon returning to Earth is approximately $24.45$ km. Comparing this value to the options provided:
The value $24.45$ km is closest to the option 20 km. Therefore, 20 km is the best estimate for the beam diameter.
A monochromatic and linearly polarised light is used in a Young's double slit experiment. A linear polarizer, whose pass axis is at an angle $45^\circ$ to the polarization of the incident wave, is placed in front of one of the slits. If $I_{max}$ and $I_{min}$, respectively, denote the maximum and minimum intensities of the interference pattern on the screen, the visibility, defined as the ratio $\frac{I_{max} - I_{min}}{I_{max} + I_{min}}$ is
A screen has two slits, each of width $w$, with their centres at a distance $2w$ apart. It is illuminated by a monochromatic plane wave travelling along the $x$-axis.

The intensity of the interference pattern, measured on a distant screen, at an angle $\theta = n\lambda/w$ to the $x$-axis is
A film projector and microscope give equal magnification. But a film projector is not used to see living cells because
A pair of parallel glass plates separated by a distance $d$ is illuminated by white light as shown in the figure below. Also shown is the graph of the intensity of the reflected light $I$ as a function of the wavelength $\lambda$ recorded by a spectrometer.
Assuming that the interference takes place only between light reflected by the bottom surface of the top plate and the top surface of bottom plate, the distance $d$ is closest to