The question asks to identify which official can be invited to provide their opinion in the Parliament. Understanding the roles and constitutional rights of various high officials is key to answering this. The Indian Constitution specifically grants certain rights to the Attorney General of India concerning participation in parliamentary proceedings.
The Attorney General for India is the highest law officer in the country. Article 88 of the Constitution of India states that the Attorney General shall have the right to speak and to take part in the proceedings of either House of Parliament, any joint sitting of the Houses, and any committee of Parliament of which he may be named a member, but without the right to vote.
This unique position allows the Attorney General to be summoned or invited by Parliament to offer legal expertise and opinions on matters being debated or considered. Their role is primarily to advise the Government of India on legal matters of national importance.
Based on the constitutional provisions, the Attorney General is the official among the given options who can be invited to give his opinion in the Parliament.
Consider the following statements:
1) The summoning of the House means convocation
2) Prorogation ends a session
3) Dissolution terminates a House
4) Prorogation of a session can be effected by the leader of the House alone
Out of these which is not true?
A Minister who for any period of six (6) consecutive months is not a member of either House of Parliament shall cease to be a Minister after the expiry of this period. This is mentioned in which Article of the Constitution?