The question pertains to the concepts of 'Censure Motion' and 'No-confidence Motion' in the context of Indian parliamentary proceedings. Let us analyze each option to identify the correct answer and understand why it is correct.

Understanding Censure Motion:

A Censure Motion is a legislative procedure by which the legislature censures the activities or policies of the government or any minister. It serves as an indication of disapproval.

Understanding No-confidence Motion:

A No-confidence Motion, however, is a formal process in which the ruling government must prove its majority in the legislature. If the government fails to do so, it must resign.

Options Analysis:

1. It is different from the No-confidence motion:

   This option is correct. A Censure Motion criticizes specific government policies or actions, whereas a No-confidence Motion tests the government's overall capability to govern.

2. It is not different from No-confidence motion:

   This option is incorrect. As explained, Censure and No-confidence motions serve different purposes.

3. It is not mandatory to mention the reasons in this motion:

   This option is incorrect. Unlike the No-confidence Motion, which does not require reasons, a Censure Motion must specify reasons, as it targets specific policies or actions.

4. Permission of the House is not essential to present it:

   This option is incorrect. Permission of the House is necessary to introduce both Censure and No-confidence motions.

Conclusion:

Based on the explanation, the correct choice is "It is different from the No-confidence motion", because a Censure Motion is focused on criticizing specific aspects of government policies or actions, while a No-confidence Motion challenges the government's overall authority.