A Minister who for any period of six (6) consecutive months is not a member of either House of Parliament shall cease to be a Minister after the expiry of this period. This is mentioned in which Article of the Constitution?
The question asks about the specific constitutional provision that states a Minister must resign if they are not a member of either House of Parliament for a continuous period of six months. Let's break down this requirement:
In India's parliamentary system, ministers are drawn from either the Lok Sabha (House of the People) or the Rajya Sabha (Council of States). While a person can be appointed as a minister even if they are not currently a member of Parliament, they must become a member of either House within a specific timeframe to continue holding their position. This ensures accountability to the legislature.
The Constitution of India lays down a condition regarding the tenure of a Minister in relation to their membership in Parliament. Specifically, if an individual is appointed as a Minister and remains a member of either the Lok Sabha or the Rajya Sabha for any period of six (6) consecutive months, they must cease to hold the office of Minister after that period expires. This rule mandates that ministers must eventually secure a seat in Parliament to continue serving.
This specific rule is explicitly mentioned in the Constitution of India under the provisions related to the Council of Ministers.
This directly addresses the scenario described in the question. A Minister must be a member of Parliament, and if they fail to be a member for six consecutive months, their position automatically becomes vacant.
While other clauses within Article 75 deal with the Council of Ministers, they cover different aspects:
Therefore, the specific provision about ceasing to be a minister after six months of non-membership is found exclusively in Article 75(5).
The constitutional provision requiring a Minister to resign if they are not a member of either House of Parliament for six consecutive months is detailed in Article 75(5) of the Constitution of India.
Consider the following statements:
1) The summoning of the House means convocation
2) Prorogation ends a session
3) Dissolution terminates a House
4) Prorogation of a session can be effected by the leader of the House alone
Out of these which is not true?