The question asks to identify the incorrect statement about cheques among the given options.
We need to evaluate each statement to determine which one is factually incorrect regarding the nature and properties of a cheque.
Statement 3 incorrectly describes a cheque as a "conditional order." Since cheques are, by definition, unconditional orders to a bank, this statement is false.
Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer using codes given below :
Answer in context of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
| List-I | List-II |
| (a) Time and place for presentment | (i) Section 19 |
| (b) Cheques are payable in demand | (ii) Section 8 |
| (c) Holder of a negotiable instrument | (iii) Section 61 |
| (d) Fictitious drawer or payee | (iv) Section 42 |
Codes:
| List - I | List - II |
| (a) Kundan Lal Rallaram Vs. Custodian | (i) Presumption under section 118 of the Negotiable Instrument Act arises only if the execution of the document is proved as true |
| (b) C.T. Joseph Vs. I.V. Phillip | (ii) Burden of proof of failure of consideration for a negotiable instrument |
| (c) A.V. Murthy Vs. B.S. Nagabasavanna | (iii) A negotiable instrument is presumed to be drawn for consideration |
| (d) Beni Madhavnath Vs. Jugandra Nath Balwan | (iv) The statutory presumption envisaged under section 118(a) of the Negotiable Instrument Act is rebuttable. |
| (a) | (b) | (c) | (d) |
Which one among the following is not a privilege or right of a holder-in-due course under Negotiable Instruments Act?