The section of holder in due course is
9
The question asks about the specific section that defines a "holder in due course". This term is crucial in the context of negotiable instruments like cheques, bills of exchange, and promissory notes.
In India, the law governing negotiable instruments is primarily the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. This Act provides the legal framework for dealing with these instruments, including the definition of key terms.
The definition of "holder in due course" is specifically provided in Section 9 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
According to Section 9 of the Act, a "holder in due course" is any person who, for consideration, became the possessor of a promissory note, bill of exchange, or cheque if payable to bearer, or the payee or endorsee thereof, if payable to order, before the amount mentioned in it became payable, and without having sufficient cause to believe that any defect existed in the title of the person from whom he derived his title.
Based on the definition in Section 9, the essential elements for a person to be considered a holder in due course are:
Understanding the definition of "holder in due course" as laid down in Section 9 is vital for grasping the rights and liabilities associated with negotiable instruments. The status of a holder in due course provides certain protections and advantages over a regular holder.
Therefore, the section of holder in due course is indeed Section 9 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
Which one among the following is not a privilege or right of a holder-in-due course under Negotiable Instruments Act?
Which one of the following statements is correct regarding the Negotiable Instruments Act in India?
The bank can refuse to make payment if the cheque is
What is the primary liability of the drawer of a bill of exchange or cheque?