Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is a vital process used to identify and evaluate the potential environmental effects of proposed projects before they are approved. In India, EIA regulations are legally mandated to ensure that developmental activities consider their environmental footprint and incorporate necessary mitigation measures. This process is fundamental for granting environmental clearance.
The Precautionary Principle is a key judicial doctrine frequently relied upon by Indian courts. This principle asserts that in cases where there is a potential for significant harm to public health or the environment, even without conclusive scientific proof of the harm, protective measures should be taken. Essentially, the lack of complete scientific certainty should not be a reason to delay actions that could prevent serious environmental damage. Indian courts have applied this principle extensively to:
Let's consider why the other options are less central to upholding EIA requirements:
The Precautionary Principle empowers Indian courts to enforce stringent environmental standards and demand preventative actions, making it the most relevant judicial principle for ensuring compliance with environmental clearance requirements within the EIA framework.
| LIST-I Judicial Decisions | LIST-II Issue |
|---|---|
| A. State of Gujarat v/s Reliance Industries Ltd & Ors. | I. Management of sewage treatment plants |
| B. Municipal Corporation Ghaziabad v/s Central Pollution Control Board | II. Climate Change |
| C. Hanuman Laxman Aroskar v/s U.O.I | III. Environmental Clearance for large infrastructure project |
| D. Riddhima Pandey v/s U.O.I | IV. Green cess |