LIST-I Judicial Decisions LIST-II Issue A. State of Gujarat v/s Reliance Industries Ltd & Ors. I. Management of sewage treatment plants B. Municipal Corporation Ghaziabad v/s Central Pollution Control Board II. Climate Change C. Hanuman Laxman Aroskar v/s U.O.I III. Environmental Clearance for large infrastructure project D. Riddhima Pandey v/s U.O.I IV. Green cess
Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
This question requires matching specific landmark judicial decisions from LIST-I with the environmental issues they primarily addressed from LIST-II. Understanding these cases is crucial for comprehending Indian environmental jurisprudence and its evolution.
The case involving State of Gujarat v/s Reliance Industries Ltd & Ors. is notably associated with environmental levies and industrial compliance. Specifically, it addressed issues related to environmental compensation or 'green cess' imposed on industries to fund environmental protection measures and remediation efforts. This aligns directly with issue IV. Green cess, reflecting the financial mechanisms for environmental upkeep.
In the case of Municipal Corporation Ghaziabad v/s Central Pollution Control Board, the primary focus was on the responsibilities of local governing bodies in environmental management and infrastructure development. A key issue highlighted was the proper functioning and management of sewage treatment plants (STPs) to effectively control water pollution caused by untreated urban waste. This corresponds directly to issue I. Management of sewage treatment plants.
The judgment in Hanuman Laxman Aroskar v/s U.O.I is significant concerning large-scale development projects and their ecological impacts. The Supreme Court emphasized the critical importance of the environmental clearance process for major infrastructure projects, ensuring that potential ecological consequences are thoroughly assessed and addressed before implementation. Therefore, it matches with issue III. Environmental Clearance for large infrastructure project.
The case of Riddhima Pandey v/s U.O.I represents a notable instance of climate change litigation within India. Filed by a minor petitioner, the case brought significant attention to the government's duty to take robust climate action, highlighting the severe impact of climate change on future generations and the fundamental rights of citizens. This matches directly with issue II. Climate Change.
Based on the detailed analysis of each case and its corresponding environmental issue, the determined matches are:
This consolidated set of matches, A-IV, B-I, C-III, D-II, accurately represents the correct pairing of these judicial decisions with their respective environmental issues.