New Bolt Report Analysis

The question asks to identify the statement that is NOT TRUE regarding the New Bolt Report, officially titled “The Teaching of English in England.” This report examined English teaching practices in the early 20th century.

Evaluating Report Statements

Let's examine each option:

• Option 1: It was commissioned in 1919. This statement is generally considered TRUE. While the report was published in 1921, its committee work and deliberations began earlier, making the 1919 timeframe plausible for its commissioning.
• Option 2: It urged the teaching of the national literature. This statement is TRUE. A key recommendation of the New Bolt Report was the increased emphasis on teaching English national literature to foster cultural identity and appreciation.
• Option 4: It aimed at uniting divided classes after the war. This statement is TRUE. Published after World War I, the report recognized the potential role of a shared understanding of English language and literature in promoting social cohesion and national unity.
• Option 3: It proposed the teaching of English Literature at the university level. This statement is NOT TRUE. The New Bolt Report's primary focus was on improving the teaching of English in schools (primary and secondary levels). It did not specifically propose the expansion or establishment of English Literature studies at the university level as a core recommendation. Its scope was largely pre-university education.

Conclusion on Report Findings

Based on the analysis, the statement that is NOT TRUE about the New Bolt Report is that it proposed the teaching of English Literature at the university level. The report concentrated on K-12 education reform.