[Extracted from the newspaper, The Hindu July 29, 2025]
This question asks us to identify a specific computer system that achieved a victory against Garry Kasparov, who was the reigning world chess champion. The context involves a significant moment in the history of artificial intelligence and chess, where machines began to challenge human mastery.
We are presented with four computer names as potential answers:
Each of these names represents different aspects of computer development, particularly in the field of artificial intelligence and its application to complex games like chess.
The question specifically asks which computer successfully defeated Garry Kasparov in a tournament match. Garry Kasparov is a legendary figure in the chess world, and his matches against computers marked important milestones.
Based on the provided correct answer, the computer identified is Deep Thought.
Deep Thought was a significant early chess-playing computer developed by researchers at Carnegie Mellon University and IBM. It was one of the first machines to seriously challenge top human players and was a predecessor to later, more famous systems. While the most widely recognized victory of a computer against Garry Kasparov in a tournament match was by Deep Blue, Deep Thought played a crucial role in the evolution of chess computers and the pursuit of artificial intelligence in chess. It represented a major step in computer chess development, showcasing the potential for machines to compete at the highest levels and paving the way for future advancements in this competitive arena.
Therefore, within the scope of this question and its options, Deep Thought is designated as the correct answer.
In October 2023, two individuals in India, Ramesh and Sameer, who identify as a samesex couple, sought to legally solemnize their marriage. Based on the Supreme Court's ruling, what is the current legal standing of their ability to marry?
After the Supreme Court's judgment in State of Tamil Nadu v. Governor of Tamil Nadu (2025), a State Governor holds a bill for eight months without taking any action—neither assenting nor returning it. The State Government believes that this delay is unconstitutional. Based on the precedent set by the judgment, what recourse is available to the State Government?
In October 2023, two individuals in India, Ramesh and Sameer, who identify as a samesex couple, sought to legally solemnize their marriage. Based on the Supreme Court's ruling, what is the current legal standing of their ability to marry?
After the Supreme Court's judgment in State of Tamil Nadu v. Governor of Tamil Nadu (2025), a State Governor holds a bill for eight months without taking any action—neither assenting nor returning it. The State Government believes that this delay is unconstitutional. Based on the precedent set by the judgment, what recourse is available to the State Government?