All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

The Companies Act, 2013 does not deal with insolvency and bankruptcy when the companies are unable to pay their debts or the aspects relating to the revival and rehabilitation of the companies and their winding up if revival and rehabilitation is not possible. In principle, it cannot be doubted that the cases of revival or winding up of the company on the ground of insolvency and inability to pay debts are different from cases where companies are wound up under Section 271 of the Companies Act 2013. The two situations are not identical. Under Section 271 of the Companies Act, 2013, even a running and financially sound company can also be wound up for the reasons in clauses (a) to (e). The reasons and grounds for winding up under Section 271 of the Companies Act, 2013 are vastly different from the reasons and grounds for the revival and rehabilitation scheme as envisaged under the IBC. The two enactments deal with two distinct situations and in our opinion, they cannot be equated when we examine whether there is discrimination or violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. For the revival and rehabilitation of the companies, certain sacrifices are required from all quarters, including the workmen. In case of insolvent companies, for the sake of survival and regeneration, everyone, including the secured creditors and the Central and State Government, are required to make sacrifices. The workmen also have a stake and benefit from the revival of the company, and therefore unless it is found that the sacrifices envisaged for the workmen, which certainly form a separate class, are onerous and burdensome so as to be manifestly unjust and arbitrary, we will not set aside the legislation, solely on the ground that some or marginal sacrifice is to be made by the workers. We would also reject the argument that to find out whether there was a violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India or whether the right to life under Article 21 Constitution of India was infringed, we must word by word examine the waterfall mechanism envisaged under the Companies Act, 2013, where the company is wound up in terms of grounds (a) to (e) of Section 271 of the Companies Act, 2013; and the rights of the workmen when the insolvent company is sought to be revived, rehabilitated or wound up under the Code. The grounds and situations in the context of the objective and purpose of the two enactments are entirely different.
(Extracted, with edits and revision, from Moser Baer Karamchari Union v. Union of India, 2023 SCC Online SC 547)

Which among the following is not a duty of a Director of the company?

The correct answer is
Duty to call upon the shareholders to attend the Board meetings

Director's Duties Explained

Understanding the duties of a company director is crucial under company law. These duties are primarily outlined in the Companies Act, 2013, and also stem from common law and judicial precedents. Directors are expected to act with due diligence, care, and in the best interests of the company. Let's analyze the options provided to determine which one is NOT a director's duty.

Analyzing Director's Responsibilities

Directors have several key responsibilities. These include:

  • Acting according to the company's constitution (Articles of Association).
  • Exercising their powers in good faith for the benefit of the company.
  • Exercising reasonable care, skill, and diligence.
  • Avoiding conflicts of interest.
  • Not accepting benefits from third parties.
  • Disclosing their interest in any proposed or existing transaction or arrangement with the company.
  • Ensuring proper records are maintained.
  • Filing necessary documents with the Registrar of Companies, such as the return of allotments after issuing new shares.
  • Ensuring the company convenes its statutory meetings, including Board Meetings and General Meetings (like the Annual General Meeting).

Evaluation of Provided Options

Option 1: To file return of allotments

This is a statutory requirement under the Companies Act, 2013. When a company issues new shares, directors are responsible for ensuring that the details of these allotments are filed with the Registrar of Companies in the prescribed form (Return of Allotment). Therefore, this is a duty of a director.

Option 2: To disclose interest

Directors owe a fiduciary duty to the company, which includes disclosing any personal interest they may have in contracts or arrangements the company enters into. This ensures transparency and prevents potential conflicts of interest. Therefore, this is a duty of a director.

Option 3: Duty to call upon the shareholders to attend the Board meetings

This statement describes an incorrect practice. Board meetings are specifically for the company's directors to discuss and decide on management issues. Shareholders, who are the owners of the company, are typically invited to attend General Meetings (like Annual General Meetings or Extraordinary General Meetings), not Board meetings. While directors are responsible for convening General Meetings, they do not call shareholders to Board meetings. Therefore, this is not a duty of a director.

Option 4: To convene General meeting

Directors are responsible for the overall governance of the company. This includes ensuring that the necessary General Meetings of shareholders are called and held as required by the Act and the company's articles. The Board of Directors, acting collectively, makes the decision to convene these meetings. Therefore, this is considered part of the directors' responsibilities.

Conclusion

Based on the analysis, the duty to call upon shareholders to attend Board meetings is not a responsibility assigned to company directors. Shareholders attend General Meetings, while directors attend and manage the affairs during Board meetings.

Was this answer helpful?

Similar Questions

  1. In which of the following cases, it was held by the Supreme Court that although a company is a separate legal entity distinct from that of its members, the corporate veil may be lifted and the corporate personality may be ignored?
  2. The process by which an organisation thinks about and evolves its relationships with stakeholders for the common good, and demonstrates its commitment in this regard by adoption of appropriate business processes and strategies is called?
  3. A director other than a managing director or a whole-time director or a nominee director who does not have any material or pecuniary relationship with the company/ directors other than the remuneration is called __________
  4. The extent to which a Corporation as a legal person can be held criminally liable for its acts and omissions and for those of the natural persons employed by it is called?
  5. Where is the origin of chess believed to be?
  6. Who was the first Indian to earn the title of chess Grandmaster?
  7. Who was the first official World Chess Champion?
  8. Which of the following computers successfully defeated Garry Kasparov, the reigning world chess champion, in a tournament match?
  9. Which of the following cities is the venue for hosting the 11th edition of Chess World Cup 2025?
  10. Where is Pahalgam situated in India?

Important Questions from GK Panorama

  1. In which of the following cases, it was held by the Supreme Court that although a company is a separate legal entity distinct from that of its members, the corporate veil may be lifted and the corporate personality may be ignored?
  2. The process by which an organisation thinks about and evolves its relationships with stakeholders for the common good, and demonstrates its commitment in this regard by adoption of appropriate business processes and strategies is called?
  3. A director other than a managing director or a whole-time director or a nominee director who does not have any material or pecuniary relationship with the company/ directors other than the remuneration is called __________
  4. The extent to which a Corporation as a legal person can be held criminally liable for its acts and omissions and for those of the natural persons employed by it is called?
  5. Where is the origin of chess believed to be?
Need Expert Advice?
More Questions from CLAT

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App