All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

The Companies Act, 2013 does not deal with insolvency and bankruptcy when the companies are unable to pay their debts or the aspects relating to the revival and rehabilitation of the companies and their winding up if revival and rehabilitation is not possible. In principle, it cannot be doubted that the cases of revival or winding up of the company on the ground of insolvency and inability to pay debts are different from cases where companies are wound up under Section 271 of the Companies Act 2013. The two situations are not identical. Under Section 271 of the Companies Act, 2013, even a running and financially sound company can also be wound up for the reasons in clauses (a) to (e). The reasons and grounds for winding up under Section 271 of the Companies Act, 2013 are vastly different from the reasons and grounds for the revival and rehabilitation scheme as envisaged under the IBC. The two enactments deal with two distinct situations and in our opinion, they cannot be equated when we examine whether there is discrimination or violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. For the revival and rehabilitation of the companies, certain sacrifices are required from all quarters, including the workmen. In case of insolvent companies, for the sake of survival and regeneration, everyone, including the secured creditors and the Central and State Government, are required to make sacrifices. The workmen also have a stake and benefit from the revival of the company, and therefore unless it is found that the sacrifices envisaged for the workmen, which certainly form a separate class, are onerous and burdensome so as to be manifestly unjust and arbitrary, we will not set aside the legislation, solely on the ground that some or marginal sacrifice is to be made by the workers. We would also reject the argument that to find out whether there was a violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India or whether the right to life under Article 21 Constitution of India was infringed, we must word by word examine the waterfall mechanism envisaged under the Companies Act, 2013, where the company is wound up in terms of grounds (a) to (e) of Section 271 of the Companies Act, 2013; and the rights of the workmen when the insolvent company is sought to be revived, rehabilitated or wound up under the Code. The grounds and situations in the context of the objective and purpose of the two enactments are entirely different.
(Extracted, with edits and revision, from Moser Baer Karamchari Union v. Union of India, 2023 SCC Online SC 547)

A director other than a managing director or a whole-time director or a nominee director who does not have any material or pecuniary relationship with the company/ directors other than the remuneration is called __________

The correct answer is
Independent Director

Defining Director Roles in a Company

Understanding the different roles within a company's board is crucial. The question asks to identify a specific type of director based on certain criteria.

Criteria for the Specific Director Role:

  • The director is NOT a Managing Director (MD).
  • The director is NOT a Whole-Time Director (WTD).
  • The director is NOT a Nominee Director.
  • The director does NOT possess a significant or financial (pecuniary) interest in the company or its other directors, beyond the standard remuneration received for their services.

Analysis of Director Types:

Let's analyze the typical roles to understand which fits the description:

  • Managing Director (MD) / Whole-Time Director (WTD): These directors are involved in the day-to-day management of the company and typically have significant operational roles and often higher remuneration packages tied to performance or executive duties.
  • Nominee Director: Appointed by a specific stakeholder, like a financial institution or a government body, to represent their interests.
  • Promoter Director: Often involved in the founding and initial setup of the company.
  • Founding Director: Similar to a promoter, one of the initial directors who established the company.
  • Independent Director: This role is specifically designed to bring objectivity to the board. Such directors are expected to be free from any potential conflicts of interest that could compromise their judgment. They do not hold material or pecuniary relationships with the company, its promoters, or management, other than their director's fees (remuneration). Their primary role is oversight and strategic guidance without being involved in the daily operations or having personal stakes beyond their professional fees.

Based on the criteria—specifically the lack of a managing, whole-time, or nominee role, and the absence of material or pecuniary relationships outside of remuneration—the director described is an Independent Director. This aligns with the principles of good corporate governance, ensuring unbiased decision-making and board oversight.

Was this answer helpful?

Similar Questions

  1. In which of the following cases, it was held by the Supreme Court that although a company is a separate legal entity distinct from that of its members, the corporate veil may be lifted and the corporate personality may be ignored?
  2. The process by which an organisation thinks about and evolves its relationships with stakeholders for the common good, and demonstrates its commitment in this regard by adoption of appropriate business processes and strategies is called?
  3. Which among the following is not a duty of a Director of the company?
  4. The extent to which a Corporation as a legal person can be held criminally liable for its acts and omissions and for those of the natural persons employed by it is called?
  5. Where is the origin of chess believed to be?
  6. Who was the first Indian to earn the title of chess Grandmaster?
  7. Who was the first official World Chess Champion?
  8. Which of the following computers successfully defeated Garry Kasparov, the reigning world chess champion, in a tournament match?
  9. Which of the following cities is the venue for hosting the 11th edition of Chess World Cup 2025?
  10. Where is Pahalgam situated in India?

Important Questions from GK Panorama

  1. In which of the following cases, it was held by the Supreme Court that although a company is a separate legal entity distinct from that of its members, the corporate veil may be lifted and the corporate personality may be ignored?
  2. The process by which an organisation thinks about and evolves its relationships with stakeholders for the common good, and demonstrates its commitment in this regard by adoption of appropriate business processes and strategies is called?
  3. Which among the following is not a duty of a Director of the company?
  4. The extent to which a Corporation as a legal person can be held criminally liable for its acts and omissions and for those of the natural persons employed by it is called?
  5. Where is the origin of chess believed to be?
Need Expert Advice?
More Questions from CLAT

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App