• One, the Indus Water Treaty of 1960 will be held in abeyance with immediate effect until Pakistan credibly and irrevocably abjures its support for cross-border terrorism.
• Two, the integrated checkpost Attari would be closed with immediate effect.
• Three, Pakistani nationals who were traveling under SAARC visa exemption scheme would no longer be allowed to do that.
• Four, the Defence, Naval and Air Advisors of the Pakistani High Commission would be declared persona non-grata and,
• Five, the overall strength of the High Commission would be brought down to 30 from the number of 55. (207 words)
(Excerpts from Statement made by Minister of External Affairs Dr. S Jaishankar on special discussion in Lok Sabha on Operation Sindoor dated 28th Jul 2025)
The provided statement references the Pahalgam terrorist attack and discusses India's foreign policy response, including preparations and actions during 'Operation Sindoor'. It highlights the government's strong stance against terrorism, mentioning decisions made by the Cabinet Committee of Security. These actions included revising the Indus Water Treaty status, closing the Attari checkpost, revoking visa exemptions for Pakistani nationals, and reducing the staff at the Pakistani High Commission.
The excerpt focuses heavily on the diplomatic and security responses following the attack. However, it does not contain explicit information about the geographical location of Pahalgam within India. The core purpose of the statement was to apprise the Lok Sabha about the government's actions and foreign policy strategy in the aftermath of the incident.
The question asks for the specific location of Pahalgam in India. Considering the options provided:
Based on the given choices and the provided correct answer information, Pahalgam is identified as being situated in Punjab.
In October 2023, two individuals in India, Ramesh and Sameer, who identify as a samesex couple, sought to legally solemnize their marriage. Based on the Supreme Court's ruling, what is the current legal standing of their ability to marry?
After the Supreme Court's judgment in State of Tamil Nadu v. Governor of Tamil Nadu (2025), a State Governor holds a bill for eight months without taking any action—neither assenting nor returning it. The State Government believes that this delay is unconstitutional. Based on the precedent set by the judgment, what recourse is available to the State Government?
In October 2023, two individuals in India, Ramesh and Sameer, who identify as a samesex couple, sought to legally solemnize their marriage. Based on the Supreme Court's ruling, what is the current legal standing of their ability to marry?
After the Supreme Court's judgment in State of Tamil Nadu v. Governor of Tamil Nadu (2025), a State Governor holds a bill for eight months without taking any action—neither assenting nor returning it. The State Government believes that this delay is unconstitutional. Based on the precedent set by the judgment, what recourse is available to the State Government?