This question asks to identify the statement that is factually incorrect regarding the role and rights of Mughal zamindars. We will analyze each option to determine which one deviates from historical facts about the Mughal administration.
Malikana = 10% (or 25% in Gujarat) of revenue
Mankar = 5-10% of revenue
Based on the analysis, Option 3 presents an assertion about the powers of a subadar that is inconsistent with the typical hierarchical structure and authority distribution within the Mughal Empire concerning zamindar appointments and dismissals. The emperor or the central court usually held significant sway over these matters.
Therefore, the statement that is not true about Mughal zamindars is presented in Option 3.
"For ensuring safety on the roads and for extending comforts to the travellers, he built sarais on the highway at a distance of two Kosh. The travellers could get beds and cooked food. There also was provision for uncooked food supplies. He built some 1700 such sarais. "Who is this ruler?
Although taken aback by the beauty of Kashmir and its gardens, which of the following emperors decreed in his 6 th regnal year that no king should visit there unless on military or administrative business, as he believed that the pursuit of pleasure was the inadequate reason for going to Kashmir ?
Aurangzeb spent nearly 25 years in Deccan, because
Who established Sera-i-Adl, an exclusive market in Delhi for manufactured and exported goods to be sold at prices fixed by administration?
Who introduced Mansabdari system into the administration under the Mughals?