A certain number of men can complete a piece of work in 6k days, where k is a natural number.
By what percent should the number of men be increased so that the work can be completed in
5k days?
20%
In work and time problems, the total amount of work is usually considered constant. The key relationship is often between the number of workers and the time taken to complete the work. Assuming each worker does work at the same rate, the number of workers and the time taken are inversely proportional.
This means if you increase the number of workers, the time taken to complete the same amount of work will decrease, and vice versa. Mathematically, this can be represented as:
$$ \text{Number of Workers} \times \text{Time} = \text{Constant Work} $$
Let's apply this concept to the given problem involving a certain number of men completing a piece of work.
We are given two scenarios for completing the same piece of work:
Let's define the variables:
Since the amount of work is the same in both scenarios, we can use the relationship:
$$ M_1 \times T_1 = M_2 \times T_2 $$
Substitute the given values for the time:
$$ M_1 \times (6k) = M_2 \times (5k) $$
Assuming $k$ is a natural number, $k \ne 0$. We can cancel $k$ from both sides of the equation:
$$ 6 M_1 = 5 M_2 $$
Now, we can express $M_2$ in terms of $M_1$:
$$ M_2 = \frac{6}{5} M_1 $$
This equation tells us that the new number of men ($M_2$) is $\frac{6}{5}$ times the original number of men ($M_1$).
We need to find the percentage by which the number of men should be increased. The increase in the number of men is the difference between the final number of men and the initial number of men:
$$ \text{Increase in Men} = M_2 - M_1 $$
Substitute the expression for $M_2$ we found:
$$ \text{Increase in Men} = \frac{6}{5} M_1 - M_1 $$
To subtract $M_1$, we can write $M_1$ as $\frac{5}{5} M_1$:
$$ \text{Increase in Men} = \frac{6}{5} M_1 - \frac{5}{5} M_1 = \left(\frac{6}{5} - \frac{5}{5}\right) M_1 = \frac{1}{5} M_1 $$
The increase in the number of men is $\frac{1}{5}$ of the original number of men.
Now, to find the percentage increase, we use the formula:
$$ \text{Percentage Increase} = \frac{\text{Increase}}{\text{Original Number}} \times 100\% $$
Substitute the values:
$$ \text{Percentage Increase} = \frac{\frac{1}{5} M_1}{M_1} \times 100\% $$
Cancel out $M_1$ from the numerator and denominator:
$$ \text{Percentage Increase} = \frac{1}{5} \times 100\% $$
$$ \text{Percentage Increase} = 20\% $$
So, the number of men should be increased by 20% so that the work can be completed in $5k$ days instead of $6k$ days.
| Scenario | Number of Men | Time Taken |
|---|---|---|
| Initial | $M_1$ | $6k$ days |
| Final | $M_2 = \frac{6}{5} M_1$ | $5k$ days |
| Concept | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Total Work | Assumed constant for a specific task | Constant |
| Inverse Proportion | Number of workers and time taken are inversely related (if work rate is constant) | $M \times T = \text{Constant}$ |
| Percentage Change | Calculated as $(\text{Change} / \text{Original Value}) \times 100\%$ | $\frac{\text{Final} - \text{Initial}}{\text{Initial}} \times 100\%$ |
When solving work and time problems like this, we usually make certain assumptions unless stated otherwise:
Understanding these assumptions helps in correctly applying the inverse proportionality relationship between the number of workers and the time taken.
Which one of the following statements best reflects the critical message conveyed by the author of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. No country needs to depend on ecosystems to boost national income.
II. Resource-rich countries need to share their resources with those of scant resources so as to prevent the degradation of ecosystems.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the central idea of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. Path-dependent green investments will eventually most likely benefit growth as well as public finances in a country like India.
II. If other green technologies follow the same pattern as that of solar energy, there will most likely be an easy green transition.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Three prime numbers p, q and r, each less than 20, are such that p − q = q − r. How many distinct possible values can we get for (p + q + r)?