Question is given followed by two Statements I and II. Consider the Question and the
Statements.
Age of each of P and Q is less than 100 years but more than 10 years. If you interchange the
digits of the age of P, the number represents the age of Q.
Question :
What is the difference of their ages?
Statement-I :
The age of P is greater than the age of Q.
Statement-II :
The sum of their ages is 11/6 times their difference.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above Question and the Statements?
(b) The Question can be answered by using one of the Statements alone, but cannot be
answered using the other Statement alone
The question asks for the difference between the ages of two people, P and Q. We are given some important initial facts about their ages:
Let's represent the age of P using digits. Suppose the tens digit of P's age is 'a' and the units digit is 'b'.
So, P's age can be written as \(10a + b\).
Since P's age is a two-digit number, \(10 \le 10a + b \le 99\). This implies that 'a' must be a digit from 1 to 9 (\(a \in \{1, 2, \ldots, 9\}\)) and 'b' must be a digit from 0 to 9 (\(b \in \{0, 1, \ldots, 9\}\)).
The age of Q is obtained by interchanging the digits of P's age. So, Q's age is \(10b + a\).
Since Q's age is also a two-digit number, \(10 \le 10b + a \le 99\). This implies that 'b' must be a digit from 1 to 9 (\(b \in \{1, 2, \ldots, 9\}\)) and 'a' must be a digit from 0 to 9 (\(a \in \{0, 1, \ldots, 9\}\)).
Combining the conditions for both P and Q being two-digit ages (greater than 10 and less than 100), both the tens digit and the units digit must be between 1 and 9. So, \(a \in \{1, 2, \ldots, 9\}\) and \(b \in \{1, 2, \ldots, 9\}\).
The difference between their ages is the absolute value of the difference: \(|(10a + b) - (10b + a)| = |9a - 9b| = 9|a - b|\).
To answer the question "What is the difference of their ages?", we need to find a unique value for \(9|a - b|\). This requires finding a unique value for \(|a - b|\) or determining the specific values of 'a' and 'b'.
Statement-I says: The age of P is greater than the age of Q.
Mathematically, this is \(10a + b > 10b + a\).
Subtracting \(10b + a\) from both sides gives:
\(10a - a + b - 10b > 0\)
\(9a - 9b > 0\)
\(9(a - b) > 0\)
\(a - b > 0\)
\(a > b\)
So, Statement-I tells us that the tens digit of P's age ('a') is greater than the units digit of P's age ('b'). Since P's digits are swapped to get Q's age, this also means the tens digit of Q's age ('b') is less than the units digit of Q's age ('a'). Crucially, it tells us $a > b$.
With $a > b$, the difference in their ages is $9(a - b)$.
We know \(a, b \in \{1, 2, \ldots, 9\}\) and \(a > b\). Let's list some possible pairs of (a, b) and the corresponding age difference:
| (a, b) pair | P's age (10a+b) | Q's age (10b+a) | Difference 9(a-b) |
|---|---|---|---|
| (2, 1) | 21 | 12 | 9(2-1) = 9 |
| (3, 1) | 31 | 13 | 9(3-1) = 18 |
| (3, 2) | 32 | 23 | 9(3-2) = 9 |
| (4, 1) | 41 | 14 | 9(4-1) = 27 |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
| (9, 8) | 98 | 89 | 9(9-8) = 9 |
As you can see from the table, Statement-I narrows down the possibilities for 'a' and 'b' (specifically, \(a > b\)), but it does not give a single unique value for the difference in their ages. The difference can be 9, 18, 27, etc., depending on the values of 'a' and 'b'.
Therefore, Statement-I alone is not sufficient to answer the question about the age difference.
Statement-II says: The sum of their ages is 11/6 times their difference.
Let the age of P be \(A_P = 10a + b\) and the age of Q be \(A_Q = 10b + a\). We know \(a, b \in \{1, 2, \ldots, 9\}\).
Sum of ages: \(A_P + A_Q = (10a + b) + (10b + a) = 11a + 11b = 11(a + b)\).
Difference of ages: \(|A_P - A_Q| = |(10a + b) - (10b + a)| = |9a - 9b| = 9|a - b|\).
According to Statement-II:
\(A_P + A_Q = \frac{11}{6} |A_P - A_Q|\)
Substitute the expressions for sum and difference:
\(11(a + b) = \frac{11}{6} \times 9|a - b|\)
\(11(a + b) = \frac{99}{6} |a - b|\)
\(11(a + b) = \frac{33}{2} |a - b|\)
Multiply both sides by 2:
\(22(a + b) = 33 |a - b|\)
Divide both sides by 11:
\(2(a + b) = 3 |a - b|\)
Since 'a' and 'b' are digits from 1 to 9, \(a+b\) is always positive. The absolute difference \(|a - b|\) is also non-negative.
We need to consider two cases for \(|a - b|\):
Case 1: \(a \ge b\)
If \(a \ge b\), then \(|a - b| = a - b\). The equation becomes:
\(2(a + b) = 3(a - b)\)
\(2a + 2b = 3a - 3b\)
Adding \(3b\) to both sides and subtracting \(2a\) from both sides:
\(2b + 3b = 3a - 2a\)
\(5b = a\)
We are looking for digits \(a, b \in \{1, 2, \ldots, 9\}\) that satisfy \(a = 5b\).
So, under the condition \(a \ge b\), the only possible pair of digits is (5, 1), resulting in ages 51 and 15, with a difference of 36.
Case 2: \(a < b\)
If \(a < b\), then \(|a - b| = -(a - b) = b - a\). The equation becomes:
\(2(a + b) = 3(b - a)\)
\(2a + 2b = 3b - 3a\)
Adding \(3a\) to both sides and subtracting \(2b\) from both sides:
\(2a + 3a = 3b - 2b\)
\(5a = b\)
We are looking for digits \(a, b \in \{1, 2, \ldots, 9\}\) that satisfy \(b = 5a\).
So, under the condition \(a < b\), the only possible pair of digits is (1, 5), resulting in ages 15 and 51, with a difference of 36.
In both possible cases derived from Statement-II (\(a \ge b\) leading to (5,1) and \(a < b\) leading to (1,5)), the calculated difference in ages is uniquely 36.
Therefore, Statement-II alone is sufficient to answer the question about the age difference.
Based on our analysis:
Now let's look at the given options:
This is incorrect, as Statement-II alone is sufficient.
This matches our findings. Statement-II alone can answer the question, but Statement-I alone cannot.
This is incorrect, as Statement-II alone is sufficient.
This is incorrect, as Statement-I alone is not sufficient.
Thus, option (b) correctly describes the situation.
Statement-I provides a condition relating the digits (\(a > b\)) but does not narrow down the possible ages or their difference to a single value. Statement-II provides a relationship between the sum and difference of the ages, which, when translated into an equation involving the digits, leads to only one possible value for the difference, regardless of which age is greater.
Therefore, Statement-II alone is sufficient to determine the difference in ages, while Statement-I alone is not sufficient.
| Statement | Analysis | Sufficient to find Unique Age Difference? |
|---|---|---|
| Statement-I: P's age > Q's age ($a > b$) | Leads to \(a > b\). Possible differences are \(9(a-b)\) where \(a>b\), e.g., 9, 18, 27... Multiple possible differences. | No |
| Statement-II: Sum = \(\frac{11}{6}\) Difference ($11(a+b) = \frac{11}{6} \times 9|a-b|$) | Simplifies to \(2(a+b) = 3|a-b|\). Possible (a,b) are (5,1) or (1,5). Both lead to a difference of 36. Unique difference found. | Yes |
Data sufficiency questions test your ability to determine if the given statements provide enough information to answer the main question. You don't necessarily have to solve the problem completely, just decide if the information is sufficient.
Typical approach involves:
The options in data sufficiency questions usually revolve around which statement(s) provide enough information.
In this specific problem, the age digits being interchanged is a key constraint that sets up the variables and relationships before even considering the statements.
A natural number N is such that it can be expressed as N = p + q + r, where p, q and r are distinct factors of N. How many numbers below 50 have this property?
Three prime numbers p, q and r, each less than 20, are such that p − q = q − r. How many distinct possible values can we get for (p + q + r)?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the most logical, rational and pragmatic message conveyed by the author of the passage?
With reference to the passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. Green energy production can be linked to/integrated with the climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies.
II. Effects of climate change are much more severe in coastal and mountainous regions.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the critical message conveyed by the passage?