The constitution of India provides for reasonable restrictions on Fundamental Rights but reasonableness must keep in mind that : 1) The interest of the general public is safeguarded 2) Prevailing social value and also social needs are not bar 3) Directive principles can be bypassed 4) Collective good is not greater Out of these :
Only 1 is correct
The Constitution of India allows for reasonable restrictions on Fundamental Rights to ensure that individual freedoms are not exercised at the cost of the larger community or against the interest of the state. Let's analyze each of the statements in the options provided:
- The interest of the general public is safeguarded: This is a valid reason for imposing reasonable restrictions. Fundamental Rights are subject to certain limitations to protect public order, morality, and health, thereby safeguarding the interest of the general public. Therefore, this statement is true.
- Prevailing social value and also social needs are not bar: While prevailing social values and needs could inform the reasoning behind restrictions, they are not sole determinants of reasonableness under the Indian Constitution. The restrictions must align with specific grounds mentioned in the Constitution, such as security of the state, public order, etc. Hence, this statement is not wholly accurate on its own.
- Directive principles can be bypassed: The Directive Principles of State Policy seek to guide the state in policy-making and governance. They are not enforceable by the courts, and therefore the aspect of 'bypass' does not apply. Constitutional validity leans towards the balance and harmony between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles rather than bypassing them. Thus, this statement is incorrect.
- Collective good is not greater: This statement is incorrect as well. Fundamental Rights may be limited in the interest of the collective good, provided the restrictions are reasonable. The collective good can be a justification for imposing restrictions on individual rights if it aligns with constitutional provisions.
Given the analysis, only the first statement has a valid reasoning under the framework of reasonable restrictions on Fundamental Rights.
Correct Answer: Only 1 is correct
Important Questions from Fundamental Duties
Consider the following statements :
1. A parents or guardian to provide opportunities for education to his child or, as the case may be, ward between the age of six to fourteen years.
2. To provide early childhood care and education for all children until they complete the age of six years.
3. To protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wild life and to have compassion for living creatures.
4. To safeguard public property and to abjure violence.
5. To provide primary healthcare to the persons below poverty line.
Which of the statements above is/are related to fundamental duties?- A Committee was constituted to formulate fundamental duties after emergency in 1976. It was headed by which of the following personalities?
Fundamental duties under Indian Constitution apply to which of the following?
- Fundamental Duties were incorporated in the Constitution on the recommendation of :
