• One, the Indus Water Treaty of 1960 will be held in abeyance with immediate effect until Pakistan credibly and irrevocably abjures its support for cross-border terrorism.
• Two, the integrated checkpost Attari would be closed with immediate effect.
• Three, Pakistani nationals who were traveling under SAARC visa exemption scheme would no longer be allowed to do that.
• Four, the Defence, Naval and Air Advisors of the Pakistani High Commission would be declared persona non-grata and,
• Five, the overall strength of the High Commission would be brought down to 30 from the number of 55. (207 words)
(Excerpts from Statement made by Minister of External Affairs Dr. S Jaishankar on special discussion in Lok Sabha on Operation Sindoor dated 28th Jul 2025)
The provided text is an excerpt from a statement made by the Minister of External Affairs in Lok Sabha concerning India's foreign policy response to the Pahalgam terrorist attack. The statement details the preparations and actions taken during an operation named Operation Sindoor.
Key decisions made following the Pahalgam attack, aimed at sending a strong message to Pakistan, were outlined. These included:
One of the significant measures taken as part of the response was the closure of the integrated checkpost Attari. This action was a direct consequence of the breach of red lines following the terrorist attack.
The question asks about the specific location of the Checkpost Attari. While the provided statement mentions the closure of this checkpost as a foreign policy response, it does not specify its geographical location. However, based on factual knowledge and the given options:
The integrated checkpost Attari is factually located Near Barmer in Rajasthan. This location is strategically significant for border management and trade.
The closure of the Checkpost Attari was a key element of the foreign policy response discussed. Its location is Near Barmer in Rajasthan.
In October 2023, two individuals in India, Ramesh and Sameer, who identify as a samesex couple, sought to legally solemnize their marriage. Based on the Supreme Court's ruling, what is the current legal standing of their ability to marry?
After the Supreme Court's judgment in State of Tamil Nadu v. Governor of Tamil Nadu (2025), a State Governor holds a bill for eight months without taking any action—neither assenting nor returning it. The State Government believes that this delay is unconstitutional. Based on the precedent set by the judgment, what recourse is available to the State Government?
In October 2023, two individuals in India, Ramesh and Sameer, who identify as a samesex couple, sought to legally solemnize their marriage. Based on the Supreme Court's ruling, what is the current legal standing of their ability to marry?
After the Supreme Court's judgment in State of Tamil Nadu v. Governor of Tamil Nadu (2025), a State Governor holds a bill for eight months without taking any action—neither assenting nor returning it. The State Government believes that this delay is unconstitutional. Based on the precedent set by the judgment, what recourse is available to the State Government?