The cations formed upon dissolving SnF4 and AuF3 in liquid BrF3 separately, respectively are
Br\(F_2^+\) only
Liquid bromine trifluoride (\(\text{BrF}_3\)) is a non-aqueous solvent that undergoes autoionization. This means it slightly dissociates into ions, similar to how water autoionizes into \(\text{H}^+\) and \(\text{OH}^-\).
The autoionization equilibrium for \(\text{BrF}_3\) is:
\(\text{2BrF}_3 \rightleftharpoons \text{BrF}_2^+ + \text{BrF}_4^-\)
In this solvent system, a substance that accepts fluoride ions (\(\text{F}^-\)) acts as an acid, increasing the concentration of the cationic species, \(\text{BrF}_2^+\). A substance that donates fluoride ions acts as a base, increasing the concentration of the anionic species, \(\text{BrF}_4^-\).
When tin(IV) fluoride (\(\text{SnF}_4\)) is dissolved in liquid \(\text{BrF}_3\), \(\text{SnF}_4\) acts as a Lewis acid. It accepts a fluoride ion (\(\text{F}^-\)) to form a complex anion, \([\text{SnF}_5]^-\).
\(\text{SnF}_4 + \text{F}^- \rightarrow [\text{SnF}_5]^-\)
Where does the fluoride ion come from? It comes from the autoionization of \(\text{BrF}_3\). The consumption of \(\text{F}^-\) (or effectively taking \(\text{F}^-\) from \(\text{BrF}_3\) which then re-establishes equilibrium) shifts the autoionization equilibrium to the right, producing more \(\text{BrF}_2^+\) and \(\text{BrF}_4^-\). The overall reaction can be written as:
\(\text{SnF}_4 + \text{BrF}_3 \rightarrow \text{BrF}_2^+ + [\text{SnF}_5]^-\)
So, when \(\text{SnF}_4\) is dissolved, the cation formed is \(\text{BrF}_2^+\).
Similarly, when gold(III) fluoride (\(\text{AuF}_3\)) is dissolved in liquid \(\text{BrF}_3\), \(\text{AuF}_3\) also acts as a Lewis acid. It accepts a fluoride ion (\(\text{F}^-\)) to form a complex anion, \([\text{AuF}_4]^-\).
\(\text{AuF}_3 + \text{F}^- \rightarrow [\text{AuF}_4]^-\)
Again, the fluoride ion comes from the autoionization of \(\text{BrF}_3\). This acidic behavior shifts the autoionization equilibrium to the right, increasing the concentration of \(\text{BrF}_2^+\). The overall reaction can be written as:
\(\text{AuF}_3 + \text{BrF}_3 \rightarrow \text{BrF}_2^+ + [\text{AuF}_4]^-\)
Thus, when \(\text{AuF}_3\) is dissolved, the cation formed is also \(\text{BrF}_2^+\).
In both cases, dissolving \(\text{SnF}_4\) and \(\text{AuF}_3\) in liquid \(\text{BrF}_3\) causes the solvent's autoionization equilibrium to shift, leading to an increase in the concentration of the solvent's characteristic cation.
Therefore, the cations formed upon dissolving \(\text{SnF}_4\) and \(\text{AuF}_3\) in liquid \(\text{BrF}_3\) separately, respectively are \(\text{BrF}_2^+\) and \(\text{BrF}_2^+\).
Looking at the options, the one that correctly identifies the cation formed in both scenarios is the one stating \(\text{BrF}_2^+\) only, indicating that for both solutes, the cation is \(\text{BrF}_2^+\).
For the following reaction sequence,

X and Y, respectively, are
The reaction of $PCl_3$ with $PhLi$ in 1:3 molar ratio yields X as one of the products, which on further treatment with $CH_3I$ gives Y. The reaction of Y with $n-BuLi$ gives product Z. The products X, Y and Z, respectively, are