Conclusions: I: All healthy people go for morning walks.
II: Evening walks are harmful.
Choose the correct option :
Understanding the Statement: Morning Walks and Health
The core statement provided is: "Morning walks are good for health." This indicates a positive correlation: engaging in morning walks contributes positively to a person's well-being.
Analyzing Conclusion I: All Healthy People Go for Morning Walks
This conclusion attempts to reverse the logic of the statement. Let's examine its validity:
- The statement implies: If you go for morning walks, it benefits your health.
- Conclusion I implies: If you are healthy, you must be going for morning walks.
- This is a logical fallacy. Just because morning walks are beneficial for health does not mean they are the only way to achieve good health, or that every healthy person necessarily performs them. People can maintain good health through various means like diet, other exercises, genetics, etc.
- Therefore, Conclusion I is an unwarranted generalization and does not logically follow from the initial statement.
Analyzing Conclusion II: Evening Walks Are Harmful
This conclusion introduces a completely new aspect – evening walks – and makes a negative assertion about them:
- The original statement exclusively discusses the benefits of morning walks concerning health.
- Crucially, the statement provides zero information about evening walks. We don't know if they are helpful, harmful, or neutral based solely on the given text.
- Making a claim about the harmfulness of evening walks is introducing information that is not present in or implied by the provided statement.
- Hence, Conclusion II is unsupported and cannot be logically derived.
Determining the Correct Option
After analyzing both conclusions against the given statement:
- Conclusion I overgeneralizes and reverses the relationship.
- Conclusion II introduces unsupported information.
Since neither conclusion is logically sound based on the provided statement "Morning walks are good for health," the correct choice must reflect this.
Final Answer Validation
The analysis confirms that Conclusion I makes an invalid leap, and Conclusion II discusses an unrelated topic without support. Therefore, the correct logical outcome is that neither conclusion follows from the premise.
The correct option is 4. Neither conclusion I nor II follows.
Important Questions from Statement and Conclusion (Notes)
- In the following question, a statement followed by 2 conclusions is given.
Choose right conclusion which logically follows the given statement.
Statement : Morning walks are good for health.
Conclusions : I. All healthy people go for morning walk.
II. Evening walks are harmful. - If there is rainfall in a village, flowers will bloom. If flowers bloom, celebrations will definitely take place. Flowers did not bloom. Which of the following is certain?
- Study the following question carefully and choose the right answer
Statement: Should articles of only deserving authors be allowed to be published?
Arguments:
(I) No, it is not possible to draw a line between the deserving and the undeserving.
(II) Yes, it will save a lot of paper which is already in short supply.
In light of the above statements, choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below. - Given below are two statements related to evaluation system.
Statement (I)Formative evaluation is administered during the lesson taught or instruction imported
Statemet (II)Summative evaluation summarizes the final progress of the students as a result of a course of learning unit.
Select the correct option - Given below are two statements regarding the characteristics of adolescence.
Statement (I) Adolescents are consistant in their emotional expressions.
Statment (II)An addescent learns to reason and seeks answer to 'how' and 'why' of everything scientifically.
Choose the correct options.
