Instructions: In these types of questions the symbols $, *, @, ©, # are used with the following meanings as illustrated below: ‘P$Q’ means ‘P is smaller than Q’ ‘P©Q’ means P is greater than Q’ ‘P#Q’ means P is equal to Q’ ‘P@Q’ means P is either equal to or greater than Q ‘P*Q’ means P is either equal to or less than Q
Statements: K * L * M # N; P @ O @ M Conclusions: I. K $ P II. K # P
if either Conclusion I or II is true.
The question provides specific meanings for several symbols. Let's break down what each symbol represents:
P$Q means P < Q (P is smaller than Q)P©Q means P > Q (P is greater than Q)P#Q means P = Q (P is equal to Q)P@Q means P >= Q (P is either equal to or greater than Q)P*Q means P <= Q (P is either equal to or less than Q)We are given two statements that we must assume are true:
K * L * M # NP @ O @ MLet's convert the given statements into mathematical inequalities using the symbol meanings:
Statement 1: K * L * M # N
K * L translates to K <= LL * M translates to L <= MM # N translates to M = NCombining these, we get the relationship: K <= L <= M = N.
Statement 2: P @ O @ M
P @ O translates to P >= OO @ M translates to O >= MCombining these, we get the relationship: P >= O >= M. This can also be written as M <= O <= P.
Now, let's combine the relationships from both statements. We see that both statements involve the element M.
From Statement 1, we have K <= M (since K <= L and L <= M, it follows K <= M).
From Statement 2, we have M <= P (since M <= O and O <= P, it follows M <= P).
Combining K <= M and M <= P, we get the overall relationship between K and P:
K <= P
This means K is either less than P (K < P) or K is equal to P (K = P).
We need to determine which of the given conclusions are definitely true based on the combined statement K <= P.
Conclusion I: K $ P
According to the symbol meanings, K $ P means K < P.
From our combined statement K <= P, this conclusion (K < P) is *possible*, but not definitely true. K could also be equal to P.
Conclusion II: K # P
According to the symbol meanings, K # P means K = P.
From our combined statement K <= P, this conclusion (K = P) is also *possible*, but not definitely true. K could also be less than P.
We have the derived relationship K <= P. This inequality holds true if and only if either K < P OR K = P is true.
Conclusion I is K < P.
Conclusion II is K = P.
Since the combined statement K <= P is true, it must be the case that either K < P is true or K = P is true. They cannot both be false if K <= P is true. However, they cannot both be true simultaneously. This scenario perfectly fits the "either/or" condition.
Therefore, either Conclusion I is definitely true, or Conclusion II is definitely true.
This corresponds to the option "if either Conclusion I or II is true."
In a certain code language, ‘TERRAIN’ is written as ‘VETTAIP’ and ‘TRAFFIC’ is written as ‘VTHAHIE’. How will ‘MOTOR’ be written in that language?
Select the option that is related to the third word in the same way as the second word is related to the first word. (The words must be considered as meaningful English words and must not be related to each other based on the number of letters/number of consonants/vowels in the word) Pig : Piglets :: Deer : ?
In the question two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements.
Statements:
P = U < M < K ≤ I > N
Conclusions:
I. N ≥ K
II. I > PStatements:
P # B $ T; R & B $ S; L % R # Q
Conclusions:
I. P # Q
II. L & Q
III. T % S
IV. P # S
Statement:
R $ W % P; N & W # S; J % T @ N; K & T
Conclusions:
I. N # J
II. P # S
III. R @ P
IV. W $ K