Instructions: In these types of questions the symbols $, *, @, ©, # are used with the following meanings as illustrated below: ‘P$Q’ means ‘P is smaller than Q’ ‘P©Q’ means P is greater than Q’ ‘P#Q’ means P is equal to Q’ ‘P@Q’ means P is either equal to or greater than Q ‘P*Q’ means P is either equal to or less than Q
Statements: D $ E $ F $ G; K © F Conclusions: I. K * G II. K © D
if only Conclusion II is true
This question asks us to analyze given statements involving specific symbols that represent inequality relationships. We need to translate these symbols into standard mathematical inequality signs to determine which of the given conclusions definitely follow from the statements.
Let's first understand the meaning of each symbol as provided:
We are given the following statements:
Statement 1: D $ E $ F $ G
Using the symbol meanings, this translates to:
D < E and E < F and F < G
Combining these, we get a chain relationship: D < E < F < G
Statement 2: K © F
Using the symbol meanings, this translates to:
K > F
Now we have the combined information:
D < E < F < G and K > F
We need to check if the given conclusions are definitely true based on the combined statements.
Using the symbol meanings, K * G means K ≤ G.
From our statements, we know K > F and F < G. We have the relationships K > F and F < G. To determine the relationship between K and G, consider the chain K > F < G. There is a break in the direction of the inequality sign (> followed by <). When the inequality signs are in opposite directions between two elements, we cannot establish a definite relationship between them.
For example:
Since the relationship between K and G can be >, <, or =, the conclusion K ≤ G (K is either less than or equal to G) is not definitely true.
Using the symbol meanings, K © D means K > D.
From our statements, we know K > F and F > D (since D < F is equivalent to F > D). We have the chain relationship K > F > D. Since K is greater than F, and F is greater than D, it logically follows that K must be greater than D.
This can be seen as K is "greater than" F, and F is "greater than" D. The "greater than" property is transitive. Therefore, K is "greater than" D.
Thus, the conclusion K > D is definitely true.
Based on the analysis:
Therefore, only Conclusion II is definitely true.
In a certain code language, ‘TERRAIN’ is written as ‘VETTAIP’ and ‘TRAFFIC’ is written as ‘VTHAHIE’. How will ‘MOTOR’ be written in that language?
Select the option that is related to the third word in the same way as the second word is related to the first word. (The words must be considered as meaningful English words and must not be related to each other based on the number of letters/number of consonants/vowels in the word) Pig : Piglets :: Deer : ?
In the question two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements.
Statements:
P = U < M < K ≤ I > N
Conclusions:
I. N ≥ K
II. I > PStatements:
P # B $ T; R & B $ S; L % R # Q
Conclusions:
I. P # Q
II. L & Q
III. T % S
IV. P # S
Statement:
R $ W % P; N & W # S; J % T @ N; K & T
Conclusions:
I. N # J
II. P # S
III. R @ P
IV. W $ K