Select the option that is related to the fifth number in the same way as the second number is related to the first number and the fourth number is related to the third number. 7 ∶ 35 ∶∶ 21 ∶ 399 ∶∶ 4 ∶ ?
8
The question presents a number analogy where the relationship between the first pair of numbers is the same as the relationship between the second pair. We need to find the number related to the fifth number based on this consistent relationship.
The analogy is given as: 7 ∶ 35 ∶∶ 21 ∶ 399 ∶∶ 4 ∶ ?
This means 7 is related to 35 in the same way that 21 is related to 399, and 4 is related to the missing number.
Let's look at the relationship between 7 and 35. We can see that 35 is a multiple of 7.
If we divide 35 by 7, we get: $35 \div 7 = 5$.
So, the relationship could be multiplication by 5: $7 \times 5 = 35$.
Now let's examine the relationship between 21 and 399. We look for a similar pattern or a consistent relationship.
If we consider multiplication, what do we multiply 21 by to get 399?
Let's divide 399 by 21: $399 \div 21$.
We can estimate: $21 \times 10 = 210$. $399 - 210 = 189$.
What do we multiply 21 by to get 189? $21 \times 9 = 189$.
So, $21 \times (10 + 9) = 21 \times 19 = 399$.
The relationship here is multiplication by 19: $21 \times 19 = 399$.
We have found the multipliers for the first two pairs:
Now, let's look for a pattern between the first number in each pair (7 and 21) and the corresponding multiplier (5 and 19).
Consider the first pair: The first number is 7, the multiplier is 5. Notice that $5 = 7 - 2$.
Consider the second pair: The first number is 21, the multiplier is 19. Notice that $19 = 21 - 2$.
It appears the pattern is: the second number is obtained by multiplying the first number by (the first number minus 2).
Relationship Pattern: Second Number = First Number $\times$ (First Number - 2)
The third pair is 4 ∶ ?. Here, the first number is 4.
Following the pattern we identified:
The multiplier should be (First Number - 2) = $4 - 2 = 2$.
The missing number should be First Number $\times$ Multiplier = $4 \times 2$.
Let the missing number be $x$. We have the pair 4 ∶ $x$.
So, the missing number is 8.
Based on the consistent pattern observed in the first two pairs of the analogy, the number related to 4 is 8.
The completed analogy is: 7 ∶ 35 ∶∶ 21 ∶ 399 ∶∶ 4 ∶ 8.
| First Number | Second Number | Relationship Calculation |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | 35 | $7 \times (7-2) = 7 \times 5 = 35$ |
| 21 | 399 | $21 \times (21-2) = 21 \times 19 = 399$ |
| 4 | 8 | $4 \times (4-2) = 4 \times 2 = 8$ |
Number analogies require you to find a logical rule or pattern connecting the numbers in one pair and apply it to another pair. Here are some strategies:
Always verify the pattern with all the given pairs before applying it to find the missing number.
Study the given pattern carefully and select the number from among the given options that can replace the question mark (?) in it.
| 13 | 16 | 52 |
| 15 | 24 | 90 |
| 23 | 36 | ? |
Select the set in which the numbers are related in the same way as are the numbers of the given set.
(NOTE: Operations should be performed on the whole numbers, without breaking down the number into its constituent digits.E.g. 13 - Operations on 13 such as adding /Subtracting /multiplying etc. to 13 can be performed. Breaking down 13 into 1 and 3 and then performing mathematical operations on 1 and 3 is not allowed.)
(25, 150, 3)
(18, 180, 5)
Study the given pattern carefully and select the number that can replace the question mark (?) in it.
First row - 12, 7, 32
Second row - 17, 13, 33
Third row - 14, 8, ?
(NOTE : Operations should be performed on the whole numbers, without breaking down the numbers into its constituent digits. E.g. 13 - Operations on 13 such as adding/subtracting/multiplying etc. to 13 can be performed. Breaking down 13 into 1 and 3 and then performing mathematical operations on 1 and 3 is NOT allowed)
Select the number that can replace the question mark (?) in the following pattern.
5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
115 | 206 | ? | 502 | 719 |
What function does the public key serve in digital signature verification?