All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which conclusions logically follow/s from the given statements.

Statements:

All summers are hot.

Some hot is water.

No water is ice.

Conclusions:

(I): Some hot is summer.

(II): No ice is water.

The correct answer is

Both conclusions (I) and (II) follow

Let's break down the given statements and analyze the conclusions using principles of logical reasoning, often associated with syllogisms. We need to determine which conclusions logically follow from the statements provided, treating the statements as true regardless of common knowledge.

Analyzing the Statements and Conclusions

The statements are:

  • Statement 1: All summers are hot.
  • Statement 2: Some hot is water.
  • Statement 3: No water is ice.

The conclusions are:

  • Conclusion (I): Some hot is summer.
  • Conclusion (II): No ice is water.

We will now examine each conclusion based on the given statements.

Evaluating Conclusion (I): Some hot is summer

Conclusion (I) states "Some hot is summer". Let's look at Statement 1: "All summers are hot".

This statement tells us that the set of 'summers' is entirely contained within the set of 'hot' things. If all members of the 'summer' category are also members of the 'hot' category, it logically follows that there must be at least some members in the 'hot' category that are also in the 'summer' category. This is a direct implication of a universal affirmative statement ("All A are B" implies "Some B are A").

Therefore, Conclusion (I) logically follows from Statement 1.

Evaluating Conclusion (II): No ice is water

Conclusion (II) states "No ice is water". Let's look at Statement 3: "No water is ice".

Statement 3 is a universal negative statement ("No A is B"). These types of statements are symmetric. If "No water is ice" is true, it means there is absolutely no overlap between the set of 'water' and the set of 'ice'. The lack of overlap works both ways. If no water is ice, it must also be true that no ice is water.

This can also be seen by considering the relationship. If being 'water' guarantees you are not 'ice', then being 'ice' must guarantee you are not 'water'.

Therefore, Conclusion (II) logically follows from Statement 3.

Summary of Conclusion Analysis

Based on our analysis:

  • Conclusion (I) "Some hot is summer" follows from Statement 1 "All summers are hot".
  • Conclusion (II) "No ice is water" follows from Statement 3 "No water is ice".

Both conclusions are logically derivable from the given statements.

Final Answer Derivation

Since both Conclusion (I) and Conclusion (II) logically follow from the given statements, the correct option is the one that states both conclusions follow.

Statement Relationship Analysis
All summers are hot. Summers $\subset$ Hot Supports Conclusion (I)
Some hot is water. Hot $\cap$ Water $\neq \emptyset$ Connects Hot and Water
No water is ice. Water $\cap$ Ice $= \emptyset$ Supports Conclusion (II)

Revision Table: Syllogism Concepts

Syllogism Type Form Implications (Examples)
Universal Affirmative (A) All A are B Some A are B, Some B are A (if A is not empty)
Universal Negative (E) No A is B No B is A, Some A are not B, Some B are not A
Particular Affirmative (I) Some A are B Some B are A
Particular Negative (O) Some A are not B No direct symmetric implication

Additional Information: Logical Deductions

Logical deduction involves moving from general premises (statements) to specific conclusions. In syllogism, we analyze the relationships between categories described in the statements to see what new relationships (conclusions) can be inferred. Key principles used here were the implications of universal statements and the symmetry of universal negative statements. Venn diagrams are often used as a visual aid to represent these relationships and check the validity of conclusions.

Was this answer helpful?

Important Questions from Conventional Syllogism

  1. Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.

    Statements:

    No bank is an office.

    All offices are stalls.

    Conclusions:

    I. No bank is a stall.

    II. No stall is a bank.

    III. Some stalls are offices.

    IV. All the stalls are offices

  2. Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.

    Statements:

    All flowers are beautiful.

    Vaidehi is beautiful.

    Conclusions:

    I. Vaidehi is a flower.

    II. Some beautiful are flowers.

  3. Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.

    Statements:

    1. All rugs are blankets.

    2. All blankets are pillows.

    3. Some blankets are frames.

    Conclusions:

    I. All pillows are rugs.

    II. Some pillows are rugs.

    III. All rugs are frames

  4. Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.

    Statements:

    Some fingers are toes.

    Some toes are rings.

    Some rings are hands.

    Conclusions:

    I. Some hands are toes.

    II. Some rings are fingers.

    III. Some hands are fingers.

    V. Some fingers are rings.

  5. Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.

    Statements:

    All polygons are angles.

    All angles are diagonals.

    All cones are cubes.

    All cubes are decagons.

    No diagonal is a cube.

    Conclusions:

    I. Some diagonals are polygons.

    II. All diagonals are decagons.

    III. No polygon is a cone.

    IV. Some cubes are angles.

Need Expert Advice?

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App