List I List II (a) K.L.N.V. Veeranjaneyulu vs Union of India and others (i) Women's right to Love and Reject (b) Abhiram Singh vs C.D. Commachen (Dead) by LRS and others (ii) Every author has a fundamental right to speak out ideas freely and express thoughts adequately (c) Pawan Kumar vs State of H.P. (iii) States are not empowered to create office of Parliamentary Secretary (d) Bimolangshu Roy (Dead) through LRS vs State of Assam and others (iv) Seeking vote in the name of religion, caste is corrupt practice
This question requires matching specific court cases from List I with the corresponding legal principles or rulings from List II. Accurate matching is key to selecting the correct option.
We analyze each item to find its correct match:
| List I Item | List II Item | Brief Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| (a) K.L.N.V. Veeranjaneyulu vs Union of India and others | (ii) Every author has a fundamental right to speak out ideas freely and express thoughts adequately | This case affirmed the fundamental right of authors to express their ideas and thoughts freely. |
| (b) Abhiram Singh vs C.D. Commachen (Dead) by LRS and others | (iv) Seeking vote in the name of religion, caste is corrupt practice | This judgment clearly stated that seeking votes based on religion or caste is a corrupt practice under electoral law. |
| (c) Pawan Kumar vs State of H.P. | (i) Women's right to Love and Reject | This case touches upon personal liberty and autonomy, including the right to choose personal relationships. |
| (d) Bimolangshu Roy (Dead) through LRS vs State of Assam and others | (iii) States are not empowered to create office of Parliamentary Secretary | The Supreme Court ruled that states do not have the power to create the office of Parliamentary Secretary. |
Based on this analysis, the correct matching is:
(a)–(ii), (b)–(iv), (c)–(i), (d)–(iii)