(a) Physical development
(b) Economic development
(c) Intellectual development
(d) Socio emotional development
Select the most suitable option :
Legislative Criteria: Juvenile vs. Young Adult Treatment
Legislations often differentiate the treatment of juveniles from young adults based on distinct developmental characteristics. The criteria primarily focus on the stages of maturation that influence an individual's understanding, behavior, and culpability.
Key Differentiating Factors
The legal system considers specific developmental criteria when deciding how to treat juveniles compared to young adults. These include:
- Physical Development: Differences in physical maturity can be relevant in certain legal contexts, although it's not always the primary factor.
- Intellectual Development: This criterion assesses cognitive abilities, reasoning capacity, and the understanding of consequences, which are typically less developed in juveniles.
- Socio Emotional Development: This focuses on emotional regulation, impulse control, susceptibility to peer pressure, and the overall maturity level, which significantly differ between age groups.
Excluded Criterion
Economic development is generally not a primary criterion used in legislation to distinguish between juvenile and young adult treatment. Legal frameworks focus more on developmental and psychological factors.
Conclusion
Based on the typical considerations in legal statutes concerning age-based distinctions, physical development, intellectual development, and socio emotional development are the key criteria.
Therefore, options (a), (c), and (d) are the relevant criteria.
Important Questions from Constitution Law
- Read Assertion (A) and Reason(R) and answer using the codes given below :
Assertion (A) : The writ of Habeas Corpus can be granted to enable the detainee to argue his case in person.
Reason (R) : Because R Vs. Secretary of State for Home Department ex parte Wynne (1992) decided so.
Codes : - Which of the following are matched incorrectly ?
i. Habeas Corpus – ‘To produce the body’
ii. Quo warranto – ‘Issued to a lower court to stop proceedings in a case’.
iii. Prohibition – ‘Issued to a lower court quashing a decision or order’
iv. Mandamus – ‘Commands a person to perform a public duty’. - Read Assertion (A) and Reason (R) to answer using codes given below :
Assertion (A) : One of the two Acts enacted under List I Entry 66 and the other under List III Entry 25 can be repugnant to each other.
Reason (R) : Because in Annamalai University Vs. Secretary of Inf. and Tourism Department decided so.
Codes : - Read Assertion (A) and Reason (R) and answer using the codes given below :
Assertion (A) : The power under 368 of the Constitution is a constituent power subject to the constitutional scheme as to distribution of legislative power according to entries in the Seventh Schedule.
Reason (R) : Because Sasanka Sekhar Maity Vs. Union of India decided so.
Codes : - It was remarked in ‘Golaknath Vs. State of Punjab’ that our ‘Preamble to the Constitution contains in a nutshell its ideals and aspirations’ by one of the judges ?
