Let R be a relation from A = {1, 2, 3, 4} to B = {1, 3, 5} such that R = {(a, b) : a < b, where a ∈ A and b ∈ B}. What is RoR -1 equal to?
{(3, 3), (3, 5), (5, 3), (5, 5)}
The question asks us to find the composite relation \(R \circ R^{-1}\) for a given relation \(R\) defined from set \(A\) to set \(B\). We are provided with the sets \(A = \{1, 2, 3, 4\}\) and \(B = \{1, 3, 5\}\), and the relation \(R\) is defined by the condition \(R = \{(a, b) : a < b, \text{ where } a \in A \text{ and } b \in B\}\).
To solve this, we need to follow these steps:
The relation \(R\) consists of pairs \((a, b)\) where \(a \in A\), \(b \in B\), and \(a < b\). Let's list the elements of \(A\) and \(B\) and find the pairs satisfying the condition:
Thus, the relation \(R\) is:
\(R = \{(1, 3), (1, 5), (2, 3), (2, 5), (3, 5), (4, 5)\}\)
The inverse relation \(R^{-1}\) is obtained by swapping the elements in each ordered pair of \(R\). If \((a, b) \in R\), then \((b, a) \in R^{-1}\). The relation \(R\) is from A to B, so \(R^{-1}\) is from B to A.
Using the pairs in \(R\), we find the pairs in \(R^{-1}\):
Thus, the inverse relation \(R^{-1}\) is:
\(R^{-1} = \{(3, 1), (5, 1), (3, 2), (5, 2), (5, 3), (5, 4)\}\)
The composite relation \(R \circ R^{-1}\) is defined such that an ordered pair \((x, y)\) is in \(R \circ R^{-1}\) if and only if there exists an element \(z\) such that \((x, z) \in R^{-1}\) and \((z, y) \in R\).
Since \(R^{-1}\) is a relation from \(B\) to \(A\), the first element \(x\) of the pair \((x, z)\) must be from set \(B\). Since \(R\) is a relation from \(A\) to \(B\), the second element \(y\) of the pair \((z, y)\) must be from set \(B\). The intermediate element \(z\) must be from set \(A\).
So, \(R \circ R^{-1}\) is a relation from \(B\) to \(B\). We need to find pairs \((x, y)\) where \(x, y \in B = \{1, 3, 5\}\) such that there exists \(z \in A = \{1, 2, 3, 4\}\) with \((x, z) \in R^{-1}\) and \((z, y) \in R\).
Let's examine the possible values for \(x\) from \(B\) and \(y\) from \(B\), and check for a connecting \(z\) from \(A\):
Check pairs starting with x = 1 (from B):
Are there pairs \((1, z)\) in \(R^{-1}\) for any \(z \in A\)? Looking at \(R^{-1} = \{(3, 1), (5, 1), (3, 2), (5, 2), (5, 3), (5, 4)\}\), there are no pairs starting with 1. So, no pairs \((1, y)\) will be in \(R \circ R^{-1}\).
Check pairs starting with x = 3 (from B):
Pairs in \(R^{-1}\) starting with 3 are \((3, 1)\) and \((3, 2)\). The connecting element \(z\) can be 1 or 2.
So, pairs starting with 3 in \(R \circ R^{-1}\) are \((3, 3)\) and \((3, 5)\).
Check pairs starting with x = 5 (from B):
Pairs in \(R^{-1}\) starting with 5 are \((5, 1), (5, 2), (5, 3), (5, 4)\). The connecting element \(z\) can be 1, 2, 3, or 4.
So, pairs starting with 5 in \(R \circ R^{-1}\) are \((5, 3)\) and \((5, 5)\).
Combining all the pairs found, the composite relation \(R \circ R^{-1}\) is:
\(R \circ R^{-1} = \{(3, 3), (3, 5), (5, 3), (5, 5)\}\)
Let's compare our result with the given options:
The calculated composite relation \(R \circ R^{-1}\) matches option 3.
| Relation | From Set | To Set | Set of Ordered Pairs |
|---|---|---|---|
| \(R\) | \(A = \{1, 2, 3, 4\}\) | \(B = \{1, 3, 5\}\) | \(\{(1, 3), (1, 5), (2, 3), (2, 5), (3, 5), (4, 5)\}\) |
| \(R^{-1}\) | \(B = \{1, 3, 5\}\) | \(A = \{1, 2, 3, 4\}\) | \(\{(3, 1), (5, 1), (3, 2), (5, 2), (5, 3), (5, 4)\}\) |
| \(R \circ R^{-1}\) | \(B = \{1, 3, 5\}\) | \(B = \{1, 3, 5\}\) | \(\{(3, 3), (3, 5), (5, 3), (5, 5)\}\) |
Based on the detailed steps of finding \(R\), \(R^{-1}\), and their composition \(R \circ R^{-1}\), the composite relation is indeed \(\{(3, 3), (3, 5), (5, 3), (5, 5)\}\).
| Concept | Definition | Notation Example |
|---|---|---|
| Relation from A to B | A subset of the Cartesian product \(A \times B\). | \(R \subseteq A \times B\) |
| Inverse Relation | If \(R\) is a relation from A to B, \(R^{-1}\) is the relation from B to A defined by \((b, a) \in R^{-1}\) iff \((a, b) \in R\). | If \(R=\{(1,2)\}\), \(R^{-1}=\{(2,1)\}\) |
| Composition of Relations | If \(R_1\) is from A to B and \(R_2\) is from B to C, \(R_2 \circ R_1\) is the relation from A to C defined by \((a, c) \in R_2 \circ R_1\) iff there exists \(b \in B\) such that \((a, b) \in R_1\) and \((b, c) \in R_2\). Note the order: \(R_2 \circ R_1\) means apply \(R_1\) first, then \(R_2\). In our problem, \(R \circ R^{-1}\) means apply \(R^{-1}\) first (from B to A), then \(R\) (from A to B), resulting in a relation from B to B. | If \(R_1=\{(1,2)\}\), \(R_2=\{(2,3)\}\), then \(R_2 \circ R_1 = \{(1,3)\}\). |
When dealing with composite relations like \(R \circ S\), it's important to remember the order of composition and the domains and codomains involved. If \(S\) is a relation from set X to set Y, and \(R\) is a relation from set Y to set Z, then \(R \circ S\) is a relation from X to Z. The composition \(R \circ S\) means that we first follow a connection from X to Y via relation \(S\), and then from Y to Z via relation \(R\).
In this problem, \(R\) is from A to B, and \(R^{-1}\) is from B to A. Therefore, \(R \circ R^{-1}\) means apply \(R^{-1}\) first (from B to A) and then \(R\) (from A to B). The resulting relation \(R \circ R^{-1}\) is a relation from B to B.
Similarly, \(R^{-1} \circ R\) would mean apply \(R\) first (from A to B) and then \(R^{-1}\) (from B to A). The resulting relation \(R^{-1} \circ R\) is a relation from A to A. In general, \(R \circ R^{-1}\) and \(R^{-1} \circ R\) are not the same relation unless the original relation \(R\) has specific properties (e.g., being a bijection if A and B are the same set and R is a function). In our case, \(R\) is not a function (e.g., 1 maps to both 3 and 5), so \(R \circ R^{-1}\) and \(R^{-1} \circ R\) will be different.
If f(x + 1) = x 2- 3x + 2, then what is f(x) equal to?
If \({\rm{f}}\left( {{{\rm{x}}_1}} \right) - {\rm{f}}\left( {{{\rm{x}}_2}} \right) = {\rm{f}}\left( {\frac{{{{\rm{x}}_1} - {{\rm{x}}_2}}}{{1 - {{\rm{x}}_1}{{\rm{x}}_2}}}} \right)\) for x 1, x 2∈ (-1, 1), then what is f(x) equal to?
In an examination, 70% students passed in physics, 80% student passed in Chemistry, 75% students passed in Mathematics and 85% students passed in Biology, and x% students failed in all the four subjects. What is the minimum value of x?
If f(x) = 2x - x 2, then what is the value of f(x + 2) + f(x - 2) when x = 0?
Let \({\rm{f}}\left( {\rm{x}} \right):\left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {{\rm{x}},{\rm{\;\;\;x\;\;is\;rational}}}\\ {0,{\rm{\;\;\;x\;is\;irrational}}} \end{array}} \right.\) and \({\rm{g}}\left( {\rm{x}} \right):{\rm{\;}}\left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {0,{\rm{\;\;\;x\;is\;rational}}}\\ {{\rm{x}},{\rm{\;\;\;x\;is\;irrational}}} \end{array}} \right.\)
If f : R → R and g : R → R, then (f – g) isWhich one of the following functions is neither even nor odd?
Let \({\rm{f}}\left( {\rm{a}} \right) = \frac{{{\rm{a}} - 1}}{{{\rm{a}} + 1}}\) .
Consider the following:
1. f(2a) = f(a) + 1
2. \({\rm{f}}\left( {\frac{1}{{\rm{a}}}} \right) = - {\rm{f}}\left( {\rm{a}} \right)\)
Which of the above is/are correct?Let R be a relation on the set N of natural numbers defined by ‘nRm ⟺ n is a factor of m’. Then which one of the following is correct?
f(xy) = f(x) + f(y) is true for all
Let S = {(x, y): x 2+ y 2= 1, - 1 ≤ x ∈ R ≤ 1 and - 1 ≤ y ∈ R ≤ 1} Which one of the following is correct?
If f(x + 1) = x 2- 3x + 2, then what is f(x) equal to?
If \({\rm{f}}\left( {{{\rm{x}}_1}} \right) - {\rm{f}}\left( {{{\rm{x}}_2}} \right) = {\rm{f}}\left( {\frac{{{{\rm{x}}_1} - {{\rm{x}}_2}}}{{1 - {{\rm{x}}_1}{{\rm{x}}_2}}}} \right)\) for x 1, x 2∈ (-1, 1), then what is f(x) equal to?
In an examination, 70% students passed in physics, 80% student passed in Chemistry, 75% students passed in Mathematics and 85% students passed in Biology, and x% students failed in all the four subjects. What is the minimum value of x?