Let R be a relation on the set N of natural numbers defined by ‘nRm ⟺ n is a factor of m’. Then which one of the following is correct?
R is reflexive, transitive but not symmetric
We are given a relation R defined on the set of natural numbers N. The relation is given by \( nRm \iff n \) is a factor of \( m \). We need to determine if this relation R is reflexive, symmetric, or transitive.
Let's examine each property for the relation \( nRm \iff n \) is a factor of \( m \), where \( n, m \in N \).
A relation R on a set A is reflexive if for every element \( a \in A \), \( aRa \) holds. In our case, the set is N and the relation is R. We need to check if for every \( n \in N \), \( nRn \) holds.
\( nRn \) means \( n \) is a factor of \( n \).
For any natural number \( n \), \( n = n \times 1 \). Since 1 is a natural number, \( n \) is indeed a factor of itself.
For example, for \( n=5 \), 5 is a factor of 5 because \( 5 = 5 \times 1 \).
Thus, the relation R is reflexive.
A relation R on a set A is symmetric if for every \( a, b \in A \), whenever \( aRb \) holds, \( bRa \) also holds. In our case, we need to check if for every \( n, m \in N \), whenever \( nRm \) holds, \( mRn \) also holds.
\( nRm \) means \( n \) is a factor of \( m \).
\( mRn \) means \( m \) is a factor of \( n \).
If \( n \) is a factor of \( m \), does it necessarily mean \( m \) is a factor of \( n \)? Let's consider a counterexample.
Let \( n=2 \) and \( m=4 \). Here, \( n, m \in N \).
Since we found a case where \( nRm \) holds but \( mRn \) does not hold, the relation R is not symmetric.
A relation R on a set A is transitive if for every \( a, b, c \in A \), whenever \( aRb \) holds and \( bRc \) holds, \( aRc \) also holds. In our case, we need to check if for every \( n, m, p \in N \), whenever \( nRm \) holds and \( mRp \) holds, \( nRp \) also holds.
Now let's substitute the expression for \( m \) from the first condition into the second condition:
\( p = l \times m \)
\( p = l \times (k \times n) \)
\( p = (l \times k) \times n \)
Since \( k \) and \( l \) are natural numbers, their product \( l \times k \) is also a natural number. Let \( j = l \times k \). Then \( p = j \times n \), where \( j \in N \).
This means \( n \) is a factor of \( p \).
So, if \( nRm \) and \( mRp \) hold, then \( nRp \) also holds.
For example, let \( n=2, m=6, p=18 \). All are natural numbers.
This example supports the transitivity. Our logical derivation confirms it for all natural numbers.
Thus, the relation R is transitive.
Based on our analysis:
Therefore, the relation R is reflexive and transitive but not symmetric. It is not an equivalence relation because it is not symmetric (an equivalence relation must be reflexive, symmetric, and transitive).
| Property | Holds for R? | Reason / Counterexample |
|---|---|---|
| Reflexive (\( nRn \)) | Yes | \( n = n \times 1 \), 1 is a natural number. |
| Symmetric (If \( nRm \), then \( mRn \)) | No | Take \( n=2, m=4 \). 2 is a factor of 4, but 4 is not a factor of 2. |
| Transitive (If \( nRm \) and \( mRp \), then \( nRp \)) | Yes | If \( m=kn \) and \( p=lm \), then \( p=l(kn) = (lk)n \), so \( n \) is a factor of \( p \). |
The relation R defined as '\( nRm \iff n \) is a factor of \( m \)' on the set of natural numbers N is reflexive and transitive, but it is not symmetric.
Understanding the different types of relations is key in set theory and discrete mathematics. Here's a quick review of the properties discussed:
| Property | Definition on Set A | Condition |
|---|---|---|
| Reflexive | For every element \( a \in A \), \( (a, a) \in R \) | Every element is related to itself. |
| Symmetric | For every \( a, b \in A \), if \( (a, b) \in R \), then \( (b, a) \in R \) | If \( a \) is related to \( b \), then \( b \) is related to \( a \). |
| Transitive | For every \( a, b, c \in A \), if \( (a, b) \in R \) and \( (b, c) \in R \), then \( (a, c) \in R \) | If \( a \) is related to \( b \), and \( b \) to \( c \), then \( a \) is related to \( c \). |
| Equivalence Relation | A relation that is Reflexive, Symmetric, and Transitive. | Partitions the set into disjoint equivalence classes. |
| Partial Order Relation | A relation that is Reflexive, Antisymmetric, and Transitive. | Often represents an ordering or hierarchy (like the factor relation). Antisymmetric means if \( (a,b) \in R \) and \( (b,a) \in R \), then \( a=b \). The factor relation is antisymmetric on N: if \( n \) is a factor of \( m \) and \( m \) is a factor of \( n \), then \( n=m \). |
Relations are fundamental concepts in mathematics. They describe connections between elements of sets. Here are some more details and examples:
The factor relation \( nRm \iff n \) is a factor of \( m \) is a classic example of a partial order relation on the set of natural numbers.
Consider the following statements:
1. The relation f defined by \(f(x)= \begin{cases}x^3, & 0 \leq x \leq 2 \\ 4 x, & 2 \leq x \leq 8\end{cases}\) is a function.
2. The relation g defined by \(g(x)= \begin{cases}x^2, & 0 \leq x \leq 4 \\ 3 x, & 4 \leq x \leq 8\end{cases}\) is a function.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
A function satisfies \(f(x-y)=\frac{f(x)}{f(y)}\), where f(y) ≠ 0. If f(1) = 0.5, then what is f(2) + f(3) + f(4) + f(5) + f(6) equal to ?
A mapping f : A → B defined as \(f(x)=\frac{2 x+3}{3 x+5}, x \in A\) If f is to be onto, then what are A and B equal to ?
If f(x) = x(4x2 - 3), then what is f(sinθ) equal to ?
f(xy) = f(x) + f(y) is true for all