In this question, a statement is given followed by two courses of action, numbered I and II. You must assume everything in the statement to be true, and on the basis of the information given in the statement, decide which of the given courses of action logically follow(s) for pursuing. Courses of Action:
Statement: Many students in rural schools fail to clear the basic reading and writing tests due to lack of trained teachers and poor infrastructure.
I. Immediate recruitment and training of teachers should be carried out in rural areas.
II. All students failing the tests should be expelled from schools to maintain quality.
The problem statement highlights a critical issue in rural schools: a significant number of students are unable to pass basic reading and writing tests. The statement explicitly identifies two primary reasons for this failure: a shortage of trained teachers and inadequate poor infrastructure.
This course of action proposes undertaking immediate recruitment and training of teachers in rural areas. Let's break down why this is a logical step:
Therefore, implementing this course of action is a logical and practical response to the problems outlined in the statement.
This course of action suggests expelling all students who fail the tests. Evaluating this proposal:
Hence, expelling students is an illogical and harsh reaction that fails to solve the core educational deficiencies mentioned in the statement.
Based on the analysis, only the first course of action logically follows as a sensible and effective measure to address the problems described in the statement. It directly targets a key cause of student failure and aims for a positive, long-term improvement in the quality of education in rural schools.
Therefore, only Course of Action I follows.