If I + J means I is the father of J; I – J means I is the son-in-law of J; and I * J means I is the wife of J, then which of the following shows that F is the brother of C, considering that C has only one sibling?
C * D – E + F
This question asks us to identify which coded expression represents the relationship where F is the brother of C, given specific codes for relationships and the constraint that C has only one sibling. Let's break down the given information:
We are looking for an expression where, based on these rules, F is the brother of C, and C has only one sibling. Let's analyze each option step-by-step.
Combining these: C (M) is father of D (M). D (M) is son-in-law of E (F). E (F) is wife of F (M). D, being son-in-law of E, is married to E's daughter. E is married to F. So, D is married to the daughter of E and F. C is the father of D. There is no direct sibling relationship between F and C here. F is the husband of E, who is D's mother-in-law. C is D's father.
| Relation | Interpretation | Deduced Genders |
|---|---|---|
| C + D | C is father of D | C (Male) |
| D – E | D is son-in-law of E | D (Male) |
| E * F | E is wife of F | E (Female), F (Male) |
Based on Option 1, F is not the brother of C.
Combining these: C (F) is wife of D (M). D (M) is son-in-law of E (?). D married E's daughter. Since D married C, C is E's daughter. E is C's parent. E (?) is father of F (?). E (M) is father of F (?). E is F's parent.
So, E (M) is the father of both C (F) and F (?). This means C and F are siblings, and C is female.
| Relation | Interpretation | Deduced Genders |
|---|---|---|
| C * D | C is wife of D | C (Female), D (Male) |
| D – E | D is son-in-law of E | D (Male) |
| E + F | E is father of F | E (Male) |
From this, we know E is the father of C and F. C and F are siblings, and C is female. The question states that C has only one sibling. This means F is the only sibling C has.
For F to be the brother of C, F must be male. The structure derived from C * D – E + F, combined with the constraint that C has only one sibling (making F that sibling), shows a scenario where F is indeed the brother of C if F is male.
Combining these: C (M) is son-in-law of E (F). E (F) is wife of D (M). D (M) is father of F (?). C married E's daughter. E and D are parents. Their daughter is the one C married. D is father of F. So F is a child of D. Since E is D's wife, F is also a child of E. F is a sibling of E's daughter whom C married. F is C's brother-in-law or sister-in-law, not brother.
| Relation | Interpretation | Deduced Genders |
|---|---|---|
| C – E | C is son-in-law of E | C (Male) |
| E * D | E is wife of D | E (Female), D (Male) |
| D + F | D is father of F | D (Male) |
Based on Option 3, F is not the brother of C.
Combining these: C (M) is father of E (M). E (M) is son-in-law of D (F). D (F) is wife of F (M). E is son-in-law of D means E married D's daughter. D is married to F. So E married the daughter of D and F. C is the father of E. There is no direct sibling relationship between F and C here. F is the husband of D, who is E's mother-in-law. C is E's father.
| Relation | Interpretation | Deduced Genders |
|---|---|---|
| C + E | C is father of E | C (Male) |
| E – D | E is son-in-law of D | E (Male) |
| D * F | D is wife of F | D (Female), F (Male) |
Based on Option 4, F is not the brother of C.
Only Option 2, C * D – E + F, establishes C and F as siblings with E as their father, and C being female. Given the constraint that C has only one sibling, F must be that sibling. For F to be the brother of C, F must be male. The structure derived from Option 2 aligns perfectly with F being the brother of C, satisfying all conditions.
| Code | Relation (I → J) | Gender Implied for I | Gender Implied for J |
|---|---|---|---|
| I + J | Father | Male | Unknown |
| I – J | Son-in-law | Male | Unknown |
| I * J | Wife | Female | Male (Husband) |
Blood relation puzzles often involve decoding relationships based on given symbols or phrases. A systematic approach is key:
These puzzles test your ability to perform logical deduction based on defined rules. Practice helps in quickly identifying the relationships and genders.
Ina certain code language,
‘A+B’ means ‘A is the mother of B’,
'A - B' means ‘A is the brother of B’,
'A x B’ means ‘A is the wife of B’ and
'\(A\div B\)' means ‘A is the father of B'.
How is M related to T if ‘M+N x P- \(S\div T\)'?
If C% D means C is the wife of D; C & D means C is the father of D; and If C $ D means C is the daughter of D, then what would X $ Y % W & Z mean if W has only one daughter?
If P $ Q means P is the husband of Q; P ! Q means P is the mother Q and P * Q means P is the daughter of Q, which of the following shows that Z is brother of W's wife, if Z is male?
If P $ Q means P is the brother of Q; P ! Q means P is the mother Q and P * Q means P is the son of Q, which of the following shows that W is brother of Z?
A # B means ‘A is the father of B’.
A @ B means ‘A is the son of B’.
A & B means ‘A is the sister of B’.
A % B means ‘A is the wife of B’.
If W # Q @ T & Y @ M % K, then how is K related to W?
If 'A % B' means A is the father of B, 'A * B' means A is the mother of B, 'A @ B' means A is the wife of B, then Which of the following means that X is the grandmother of Y?
In a certain code language,
'A - B' means 'A is father of B'
'A + B' means 'A is mother of B'
'A × B' means 'A is husband of B', and
'A ÷ B' means 'A is the son of B'.
If 'U ÷ Q ÷ P - R × S + T × V', then how is U related to V?