All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

According to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, what happens when the precision in measuring position increases?

The correct answer is

Greater precision in one variable leads to greater uncertainty in other

The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, a cornerstone of quantum mechanics proposed by Werner Heisenberg in 1927, states that it is fundamentally impossible to simultaneously know both the exact position and the exact momentum of a particle (especially at the atomic/subatomic scale) with arbitrary precision. Mathematically:

Δx · Δp ≥ h / 4π

where Δx is the uncertainty (or error margin) in measuring position, Δp is the uncertainty in measuring momentum, and h is Planck's constant (≈ 6.626 × 10⁻³⁴ J·s).

Why this happens conceptually: at the quantum scale, particles exhibit wave-particle duality — an electron, for instance, behaves partly like a wave. To precisely pin down its position, one would need to confine its associated wave to a very narrow region, but a spatially narrow wave packet must be built from a broad range of wavelengths (and hence momenta), by the mathematics of Fourier analysis. Conversely, a wave with a single, well-defined wavelength (precise momentum) is spread out infinitely in space, giving no precise position. This is not a limitation of our measuring instruments — it is an intrinsic property of nature itself.

Because Δx and Δp are related by an inverse relationship (their product must always be at least h/4π), increasing the precision of the position measurement (making Δx smaller) forces Δp to become larger — i.e., the momentum becomes correspondingly less certain. This is exactly the statement that greater precision in one variable leads to greater uncertainty in the other, confirming why this is the correct description.

The remaining options are incorrect because they all attempt to evade this fundamental trade-off: claiming measurements are "unaffected" ignores that the principle applies to all matter, not just larger classical bodies where the effect becomes negligible; claiming both uncertainties decrease together, or that both variables can always be measured accurately at once, directly contradicts the inequality Δx·Δp ≥ h/4π, which sets a non-zero lower bound on their product that can never be beaten regardless of measurement technique.

Was this answer helpful?

Similar Questions

  1. What does the Aufbau principle state about electron filling in orbitals?

  2. Two atoms having the same number of nucleons but different atomic numbers are called ________.

  3. The charge of an electron is best described as:

  4. Cathode rays observed in discharge tubes are best described as:

  5. Proton discovery is associated with which observation in discharge tube experiments?

  6. Why are half-filled orbitals considered more stable?

  7. Which statement best explains origin of spectral lines from quantized electronic transitions in atoms?

  8. Isotopes of the same element possess different atomic masses because they contain different numbers of ________.

  9. What do electron shells represent in atomic structure?

  10. According to the Aufbau principle, how are electrons distributed among atomic orbitals?


Important Questions from Structure of Atom

  1. Identify the element having zero valency

  2. The atomic number of an element is 8. How many electrons will it gain to form a compound with sodium?

  3. An atom of carbon has 6 protons. Its mass number is 12. How many neutrons are present in an atom of carbon?

  4. What is the atomic number of nitrogen?

  5. What are isobars?

Need Expert Advice?
Test Series
RRB JE img
Railways
RRB JE Prev. Yr. Paper (CBT 1 + CBT 2) Test Series
290 Tests 5 Tests Free
4460 Attempts
4.3(88)
English

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App