(Hint: The sentence order in Language A is SOV.)
Use the forms ‘tabermashita’ (“ate”), ‘ringo’ (“apple”) and ‘-ni’ (“in”) and identify the correct translations of the following two sentences (S1 and S2).
S1: Jack ate an apple.
S2: John is in school.Column X:
Language AColumn Y:
EnglishJakku-ga gakkoo-e ik-imasu Jack goes to school Kazuko-ga gakkoo-de imasu Kazuko is at school Jon-ga shinbun-o yom-imasu John reads a newspaper
To translate the given sentences from English to Language A, we will make use of the provided hint that the sentence order in Language A follows a Subject-Object-Verb (SOV) structure. Let's evaluate each sentence:
Upon examining the options:
Therefore, the correct answer is:
S1: Jakku-ga ringo-o tabermashita
S2: Jon-ga gakkoo-ni imasu
| X | Y |
| P. MAK Halliday | i. American Structuralism |
| Q. Leonard Bloomfield | ii. Cognitivism |
| R. BF Skinner | iii. Functionalism |
| S. Jean Piaget | iv. Behaviourism |
Consider the statement: “This is a dragon”. How could this, mentioned in the statement, be instantiated as a description of Aristotle's notion of substance?
Which one of the following options correctly matches the texts with their authors?
| a. The Lay of the Last Minstrel | i. Samuel Taylor Coleridge |
| b. “The Eolian Harp" | ii. Thomas De Quincey |
| c. “Ode to Psyche” | iii. John Keats |
| d. “The Pains of Opium” | iv. Sir Walter Scott |