Consider the following statements regarding transmission lines : 1. In single-stub matching, the combination of stub and line presents a conductance which is equal to twice of the characteristic conductance of the line. 2. Single-stub matching is useful for all frequencies because the position of the stub can be varied with the variation in frequency. 3. Single-stub matching system is a narrowband system. Which of the above statements are not correct?
Single-stub matching aims to transform the load impedance ($Z_L$) to the characteristic impedance ($Z_0$) of the transmission line. Using normalized admittances ($y = Y/Y_0$), the goal is to achieve an input admittance of $y_{in} = 1 + j0$.
This implies the input conductance ($g_{in}$) required for matching should be normalized $1$. Statement 1 asserts that the combination of the stub and line presents a conductance equal to twice the characteristic conductance (normalized $g_{in} = 2$). This contradicts the fundamental objective of impedance matching.
Therefore, statement 1 is incorrect.
The position ($d$) of the stub along the transmission line is determined by the wavelength ($\lambda$) at the operating frequency ($f$). The electrical length is given by $\beta d$, where $\beta$ is the phase constant. Since $\lambda = c/f$, the required position $d$ is intrinsically dependent on the frequency.
While the stub's position can be physically adjusted, this adjustment is necessary for each frequency change. It does not imply the system is inherently effective across "all frequencies".
Therefore, statement 2 is incorrect.
Single-stub matching networks are designed and optimized for a single, specific frequency. The required line lengths and stub positions are calculated based on the wavelength pertinent to that frequency.
When the operating frequency deviates from the design frequency, the impedance transformations change, and the matching condition is usually no longer met. This inherent sensitivity to frequency variations characterizes single-stub matching as a narrowband technique.
Therefore, statement 3 is correct.
The analysis reveals that statements 1 and 2 are not correct because they misrepresent the goals and characteristics of single-stub matching concerning conductance values and frequency applicability. Statement 3 accurately describes the narrowband nature of this technique.
The question asks to identify the statements that are not correct.
Statements 1 and 2 are identified as incorrect.
This corresponds to Option A.
A characteristic impedance does NOT satisfy which of the following statements?
The dielectric constant of the material used in a transmission line is 2. What is the velocity factor of this line if its characteristic impedance is 300 Ω?
What is the VSWR when feeding an RF signal to a 55 Ω load through a coaxial cable of characteristic impedance 50 Ω?
A transmission line of \(50{\rm{\;\Omega }}\) characteristic impedance is terminated with a \(\rm 100 \ Ω\) resistance. The minimum impedance measured on the line is equal to
Twisting of live and return lines in long signal lines is done to reduce the effect of