Alkaline soils are reclaimed by
addition of gypsum and leaching
Alkaline soils, also known as sodic or saline-sodic soils, pose significant challenges for agriculture due to their high pH and the presence of excessive sodium ($Na^+$) ions. These conditions can lead to poor soil structure, reduced water infiltration, and impaired plant growth. Reclamation aims to correct these issues, making the soil suitable for cultivation.
The most effective method for reclaiming alkaline soils involves a two-step process: chemical amendment using a calcium source and physical removal of the displaced salts.
Gypsum, chemically known as calcium sulfate dihydrate ($CaSO_4 \cdot 2H_2O$), is the most common and effective amendment for alkaline soils. Its primary function is to provide calcium ions ($Ca^{2+}$) to the soil.
$$ \text{Soil-Na} + \text{CaSO}_4 \cdot 2\text{H}_2\text{O} \rightarrow \text{Soil-Ca} + 2\text{Na}^+ + \text{SO}_4^{2-} + 2\text{H}_2\text{O} $$
(Note: $Na^+$ and $SO_4^{2-}$ become soluble salts in the soil water)While gypsum replaces problematic sodium ions, the displaced sodium, now combined with sulfate ions to form sodium sulfate ($Na_2SO_4$) or remaining as sodium ions ($Na^+$) with other anions, must be removed from the root zone. This removal process is called leaching.
The combination of gypsum addition and leaching is essential for successful alkaline soil reclamation:
This combined approach restores the soil's physical properties (improving structure, permeability, and aeration) and chemical properties (reducing pH and sodium levels).
Therefore, the addition of gypsum followed by leaching is the standard and most effective procedure for reclaiming alkaline (sodic) soils.
Irrigation water having SAR value of 20, is called
The ratio between the areas of a crop irrigated and the quantity of water required during its entire period of growth is known as
For crops like potato and sugar-beets, the commonly adopted method of surface irrigation is
12 m 3/sec of water is diverted to a 30 hectare field for 5 hours. Soil probing after irrigation showed that 0.4 m of water had been stored in the root zone. Water application efficiency in this case would be