A question is followed by two statements numbered I and II. You have to decide whether the data provided in the statements are sufficient to answer the question. Read both the statements and select the most appropriate answer.
C, I, L, N, R, and Y live on six different floors of the same building. The lowermost floor in the building is numbered 1, the floor above it is numbered 2, and so on, till the topmost floor is numbered 6. Who among them lives immediately above Y?
(I) Only four people live between N and I. C lives immediately below I.
(II) Only one person lives between C and R. Y lives immediately above N.
This problem involves determining the arrangement of six people—C, I, L, N, R, and Y—on six distinct floors of a building. The floors are numbered from 1 (the lowest) to 6 (the highest). Our objective is to find out which person lives on the floor immediately above Y. We must use the information provided in two statements to see if it's sufficient to solve this puzzle.
Statement I gives us two conditions:
Let's consider the possible scenarios based on these conditions:
Because we cannot determine the exact position of Y from Statement I alone, it is not sufficient to answer the question.
Statement II provides the following conditions:
Let's test if these conditions are enough on their own:
Therefore, Statement II alone is not sufficient to answer the question.
Now, let's combine the information from both Statement I and Statement II to see if we can find a unique solution.
This leads to a single, complete, and consistent arrangement of all six people:
| Floor | Person |
|---|---|
| 6 | I |
| 5 | C |
| 4 | L |
| 3 | R |
| 2 | Y |
| 1 | N |
The question asks: "Who among them lives immediately above Y?"
Observing our final arrangement, Y is on floor 2. The person on floor 3, which is immediately above Y, is R.
Since combining both statements allows us to determine a unique answer, the data in both statements together is sufficient to answer the question.
Both Statement I and Statement II, when used together, provide sufficient data to solve the puzzle and determine that R lives immediately above Y.
P and Q are children of S. Who is the father of P? To answer this question which of the statements (1) and (2) is/are necessary?
(1) R is the brother of P and the son of T.
(2) U is the mother of Q.
Given below is a question followed by two statements, I and II, each containing some information. Decide which of the statements are sufficient to answer the question.
Question:
Rajesh's salary is Rs. 12,500. What is Arvind's salary?
Statements
I. Arvind gets $\frac{3}{5}$th of the total salary of his and Rajesh'
II. Two-thirds of Arvind's salary is equal to the average salary of both.
Given below is a question followed by two statements, I and II, each containing some information. Decide which of the statements are sufficient to answer the question. The difference between father's age and son's age is 21 years now. What is the present age of the son?
Statements
I. After five years, the ratio of father's age to that of the son would be 5:2.
II. The sum of father's age and son's age after five years would be 66 years.