All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

In light of the statements I and II choose the most appropriate option.
If a group comprises of five persons A, B, C, D and E, then how many persons are taller than E?
Statement (I) A is taller than B and B is shorter than A and E only.
Statement (II) C is shorter than A and A is shorter than E.

The correct answer is
Both statement I and statement II together are required to answer the question.

Evaluating Statement I: Height Relationships

Statement (I) provides the following information about the heights:

  • A is taller than B: A > B$
  • B is shorter than A and E only. This implies:
    • B is shorter than A (A > B$)
    • B is shorter than E (E > B$)
    • Since B is shorter than *only* A and E among the group {A, B, C, D, E}, it means B is taller than the remaining individuals, C and D.
    • So, B is taller than C: B > C$
    • And B is taller than D: B > D$

From Statement (I), we know that A and E are both taller than B, and B is taller than C and D. This establishes that A and E are taller than B, C, and D. However, we do not know the height relationship between A and E. Therefore, we cannot determine how many people are taller than E based solely on Statement I.

Conclusion: Statement I alone is not sufficient.

Evaluating Statement II: Height Relationships

Statement (II) provides the following information:

  • C is shorter than A: A > C$
  • A is shorter than E: E > A$

Combining these, we get the relationship E > A > C$. This tells us that E is taller than A and C. However, we have no information about the heights of B and D relative to E. Therefore, we cannot determine how many people are taller than E based solely on Statement II.

Conclusion: Statement II alone is not sufficient.

Combining Statements I and II for Height Comparison

Now, let's combine the information from both statements:

  • From Statement I: A > B$, E > B$, B > C$, B > D$.
  • From Statement II: E > A$.

Let's consolidate the height orderings:

  • We know E > A$ (from II).
  • We know A > B$ (from I).
  • We know B > C$ and B > D$ (from I).
  • Also E > B$ (from I), which is consistent with E > A > B$.

This implies the complete ordering relative to E is:

  • E is taller than A.
  • E is taller than B (since E > A > B$).
  • E is taller than C (since E > A > B > C$).
  • E is taller than D (since E > A > B > D$).

Therefore, E is the tallest person in the group {A, B, C, D, E}. The question asks how many persons are taller than E. Since E is the tallest, no one is taller than E.

Conclusion: Both statements together are sufficient to answer the question.

Final Decision on Sufficiency

Since neither Statement I nor Statement II alone is sufficient to determine the number of people taller than E, but combining both statements allows us to definitively answer the question, we need both statements together.

Thus, the correct option is that both statement I and statement II together are required to answer the question.

Was this answer helpful?

Important Questions from Data Sufficiency (Notes)

  1. In light of the statements I and II choose the most appropriate option.
    Eight boxes- A, B, C, D, P, Q, R and S are stacked vertically but not necessarily in the same order. Which among them is kept immediately above R?
    Statement (I) Only three boxes are kept above D and only one box is kept between D and Q. Q is kept lower than D and is immediately below P.
    Statement (II) Only one box is kept between A and C. C is kept three boxes above Q. As many boxes are kept above B as are kept below R.
  2. A question is followed by two statements numbered I and II. You have to decide whether the data provided in the statements are sufficient to answer the question. Read both the statements and select the most appropriate answer.
    C, I, L, N, R, and Y live on six different floors of the same building. The lowermost floor in the building is numbered 1, the floor above it is numbered 2, and so on, till the topmost floor is numbered 6. Who among them lives immediately above Y?
    (I) Only four people live between N and I. C lives immediately below I.
    (II) Only one person lives between C and R. Y lives immediately above N.

  3. P and Q are children of S. Who is the father of P? To answer this question which of the statements (1) and (2) is/are necessary? 
    (1) R is the brother of P and the son of T. 
    (2) U is the mother of Q.

  4. Given below is a question followed by two statements, I and II, each containing some information. Decide which of the statements are sufficient to answer the question. 
    Question: 
    Rajesh's salary is Rs. 12,500. What is Arvind's salary? 
    Statements 
    I. Arvind gets $\frac{3}{5}$th of the total salary of his and Rajesh' 
    II. Two-thirds of Arvind's salary is equal to the average salary of both.

  5. Given below is a question followed by two statements, I and II, each containing some information. Decide which of the statements are sufficient to answer the question. The difference between father's age and son's age is 21 years now. What is the present age of the son? 
    Statements 
    I. After five years, the ratio of father's age to that of the son would be 5:2. 
    II. The sum of father's age and son's age after five years would be 66 years.

Need Expert Advice?

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App