If a group comprises of five persons A, B, C, D and E, then how many persons are taller than E?
Statement (I) A is taller than B and B is shorter than A and E only.
Statement (II) C is shorter than A and A is shorter than E.
Statement (I) provides the following information about the heights:
A > B$A > B$)E > B$)B > C$B > D$From Statement (I), we know that A and E are both taller than B, and B is taller than C and D. This establishes that A and E are taller than B, C, and D. However, we do not know the height relationship between A and E. Therefore, we cannot determine how many people are taller than E based solely on Statement I.
Conclusion: Statement I alone is not sufficient.
Statement (II) provides the following information:
A > C$E > A$Combining these, we get the relationship E > A > C$. This tells us that E is taller than A and C. However, we have no information about the heights of B and D relative to E. Therefore, we cannot determine how many people are taller than E based solely on Statement II.
Conclusion: Statement II alone is not sufficient.
Now, let's combine the information from both statements:
A > B$, E > B$, B > C$, B > D$.E > A$.Let's consolidate the height orderings:
E > A$ (from II).A > B$ (from I).B > C$ and B > D$ (from I).E > B$ (from I), which is consistent with E > A > B$.This implies the complete ordering relative to E is:
E > A > B$).E > A > B > C$).E > A > B > D$).Therefore, E is the tallest person in the group {A, B, C, D, E}. The question asks how many persons are taller than E. Since E is the tallest, no one is taller than E.
Conclusion: Both statements together are sufficient to answer the question.
Since neither Statement I nor Statement II alone is sufficient to determine the number of people taller than E, but combining both statements allows us to definitively answer the question, we need both statements together.
Thus, the correct option is that both statement I and statement II together are required to answer the question.
A question along with a set of statements is given below. We have to find which of the given statements is/are sufficient to answer the given question.
Question : Find the area of the triangle PQR.
Statements :
I. PQ = 5 m., PR = 5 m.
II. Length of PO is 4 m.
Given below is a question followed by two statements, I and II, each containing some information. Decide which of the statements are sufficient to answer the question. The difference between father's age and son's age is 21 years now. What is the present age of the son?
Statements
I. After five years, the ratio of father's age to that of the son would be 5:2.
II. The sum of father's age and son's age after five years would be 66 years.
P and Q are children of S. Who is the father of P? To answer this question which of the statements (1) and (2) is/are necessary?
(1) R is the brother of P and the son of T.
(2) U is the mother of Q.
Given below is a question followed by two statements, I and II, each containing some information. Decide which of the statements are sufficient to answer the question.
Question:
Rajesh's salary is Rs. 12,500. What is Arvind's salary?
Statements
I. Arvind gets $\frac{3}{5}$th of the total salary of his and Rajesh'
II. Two-thirds of Arvind's salary is equal to the average salary of both.