All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

Writers of detective fiction often include an incompetent detective as a foil for the brilliant investigator-protagonist as they follow different paths in trying to solve the crime. In the individual accounts, the incompetent detective is frequently distracted by the culprit's careful plans, while the competent investigator solves the case after a final confrontation. Analysts of such fiction believe that the authors select this story-telling technique to provide readers with more complexities in the form of misleading clues, while figuring out the crime. 

Which of the following statements most logically follows from the passage above?

The correct answer is
Writers of detective fiction use two investigative accounts to make it difficult for the reader to figure out the outcome.

Detective Fiction: Core Narrative Technique

Writers often use an incompetent detective as a foil to a brilliant investigator. This narrative contrast is employed to introduce complexities and misleading clues. The primary purpose is to challenge readers in figuring out the crime.

Detective Fiction: Reader Difficulty Explained

The passage highlights detectives following different paths, which can be interpreted as the basis for two investigative accounts.

The author's intentional inclusion of misleading clues and heightened complexities through these contrasting accounts directly contributes to making it difficult for the reader to figure out the outcome.

This logical connection explains why writers utilize this technique to enhance the puzzle and challenge for the audience.

Was this answer helpful?

Important Questions from Analytical Reasoning Drawing Reasonable Conclusions from Passages

  1. What according to Kant is unconditionally good?
  2. Which one of the following does cultural relativism in ethics entail ?
  3. Jean Paul Sartre ontologically distinguishes a knife from a human being. This distinction depends upon which one of the following theses?
  4. Kant provides a famous refutation of an ontological argument for the existence of God of the kind provided by St. Anselm.

    Which one of the following statements appears as a premise in this refutation?
  5. Which of the following claims is/are endorsed by Iqbal in The Secrets of the Self?
Need Expert Advice?

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App