Cultural relativism in ethics is the viewpoint that an individual's beliefs and activities should be understood based on that person's own culture. It suggests that moral standards are not absolute but are instead relative to societal or cultural norms.
This presents a specific, absolute moral rule. Cultural relativism does not inherently support such universal commands, as it posits that moral rules vary between cultures.
This option accurately captures the essence of cultural relativism. It asserts that the relativity of values (i.e., values depend on culture) is a fundamental principle, applicable across all contexts.
Cultural relativism suggests values are specific to a culture, implying consensus *within* a culture is possible and expected. It doesn't state that consensus is impossible overall.
This contradicts cultural relativism. The theory emphasizes the diversity and uniqueness of cultural values, rather than advocating for universal norms.
Therefore, the core idea entailed by cultural relativism in ethics is that moral values are determined by and specific to each culture, and this perspective is presented as a general truth.
“Here was I, the white man with his gun, standing in front of the unarmed native crowd-seemingly the leading actor of the piece; but in reality I was only an absurd puppet pushed to and fro by the will of those yellow faces behind. I perceived in this moment that when the white man turns tyrant it is his own freedom that he destroys. He becomes a sort of hollow, posing dummy, the conventionalised figure of a sahib."
What condition(s) is/are illustrated in the above lines from George Orwell's essay "Shooting an Elephant"?