All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

Who among the following were awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2020 for their exemplary work in genome editing?

The correct answer is

Jennifer A Doudna and Emmanuelle Charpentier

Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2020 for Genome Editing

The Nobel Prize in Chemistry is awarded annually by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences to scientists in the various fields of chemistry. The 2020 Nobel Prize in Chemistry recognized groundbreaking work in the field of genome editing.

The question asks specifically about who was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 2020 for their significant contributions to genome editing. Let's look at the options provided and the specific work they are recognized for, particularly in the context of Nobel Prizes around that time.

  • George P Smith and Sir Gregory P Winter: These scientists were awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry, but in 2018, for their work on the phage display of peptides and antibodies. This is different from genome editing and the year is not 2020.
  • James P Allison and Tasuku Honjo: These researchers received the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, also in 2018. Their award was for their discovery of cancer therapy by inhibition of negative immune regulation. Again, this is not the Chemistry prize, nor is it 2020, and the field is different from genome editing.
  • Jennifer A Doudna and Emmanuelle Charpentier: This pair of scientists was indeed awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 2020. Their pioneering work focused on developing a method for genome editing, specifically the $\text{CRISPR/Cas9}$ genetic scissors. This aligns with the question's criteria.
  • Gerard Mourou and Donna Strickland: These individuals were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2018 for their method of generating high-intensity, ultra-short optical pulses. This is in the field of physics, not chemistry, and the year is 2018, not 2020.

Based on the analysis of the options and the specific award year and field mentioned in the question (Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2020 for genome editing), the correct recipients are Jennifer A Doudna and Emmanuelle Charpentier.

Their development of the $\text{CRISPR/Cas9}$ method has revolutionized molecular biology, providing a powerful tool to edit DNA with high precision, allowing scientists to change the DNA of animals, plants, and microorganisms with extremely high precision. This technology has had an enormous impact on basic research, is contributing to the development of new medical therapies, and is enabling the breeding of new crops.

Laureates Nobel Prize Field Year Contribution
George P Smith & Sir Gregory P Winter Chemistry 2018 Phage display of peptides and antibodies
James P Allison & Tasuku Honjo Physiology or Medicine 2018 Cancer therapy by inhibition of negative immune regulation
Jennifer A Doudna & Emmanuelle Charpentier Chemistry 2020 Development of a method for genome editing ($\text{CRISPR/Cas9}$)
Gerard Mourou & Donna Strickland Physics 2018 High-intensity, ultra-short optical pulses

Revision Table: Nobel Prizes in Chemistry and Related Fields

Here is a summary table covering the laureates mentioned in the options and their respective Nobel Prizes:

Laureates Nobel Prize Field Year Awarded Key Area of Work
Jennifer A Doudna and Emmanuelle Charpentier Chemistry 2020 Genome Editing ($\text{CRISPR/Cas9}$)
George P Smith and Sir Gregory P Winter Chemistry 2018 Phage display
James P Allison and Tasuku Honjo Physiology or Medicine 2018 Cancer Immunotherapy
Gerard Mourou and Donna Strickland Physics 2018 Laser Physics (Chirped Pulse Amplification)

Additional Information on Genome Editing and CRISPR/Cas9

Genome editing is a technology that allows scientists to make changes to the DNA of living organisms. This can involve adding, removing, or altering genetic material at specific locations in the genome. The development of easy and precise methods for genome editing has been a major breakthrough in life sciences.

The $\text{CRISPR/Cas9}$ system is often referred to as "genetic scissors" because it acts like a pair of molecular scissors that can cut DNA at a precise location. It originates from a defense mechanism found in bacteria that they use to cut up the DNA of invading viruses.

The key components of the $\text{CRISPR/Cas9}$ system are:

  • A guide RNA molecule: This molecule is designed to match a specific DNA sequence in the genome that the scientist wants to target. It acts like a GPS navigator, guiding the $\text{Cas9}$ protein to the correct location.
  • The $\text{Cas9}$ protein: This protein is the "scissors". It is an enzyme that can cut both strands of the DNA double helix at the location specified by the guide RNA.

Once the DNA is cut, the cell's natural repair mechanisms try to fix the break. Scientists can exploit this repair process to make specific changes to the DNA sequence, such as inserting new genetic material, deleting a gene, or correcting a mutation. This powerful tool has vast potential for research and therapeutic applications.

Was this answer helpful?

Important Questions from Developments in Science Technology

  1. Who was the first Mathematician to calculate the correct value of pi ($\pi$) ?
  2. Which of the following statements are true about the sand glass (hour glass) ?
    (a) The first reference to sand glass in Afghanistan seems to occur in Mir Khwand's Rauzat-us Safa.
    (b) By the 16th century the sand glasses in use in India were so made as to show the Indian measure of time (ghari).
    (c) The sand glass begins to be shown in Mughal miniatures from Akbar's time onwards.
    (d) Ramchandra's Yantra Prakasha and Jnanaraja's Sundara Siddhanta refer to sand-clock.
    Select the correct answer from the code given below :
  3. 3101 B.C. as the date of Mahabharata war is mentioned in which of the following inscriptions ?
  4. Arrange the following astronomers in the chronological order :
    (a) Bhaskaracharya (b) Bhoja (c) Brahmagupta (d) Varahamihira
    Select the correct answer from the code given below :
  5. Below are the two statements : One labelled as Assertion (A) and the other as Reason (R) :
    Assertion (A) : There were many good reasons for avoiding technological innovation or any form of mechanization of Indian manufactures in medieval India.
    Reason (R) : As any innovation implied a measure of risk and some investment of capital, the Indian workman living on the margin of subsistence had hardly any means to undertake it. In such a situation only a limited technological innovation initiated by the state or by the profit-seeking merchant could be expected.
    Code :
Need Expert Advice?

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App