Which provision of Constitution provide power to parliament to establish a new state?
Article 2 & 3
The Constitution of India grants specific powers to the Parliament regarding the formation and alteration of states. Understanding these provisions is crucial for comprehending the territorial structure of the Indian Union.
The primary articles that deal with the admission or establishment of new states and the alteration of the areas, boundaries, or names of existing states are found in Part I of the Constitution, which pertains to the Union and its Territory.
Let's examine the relevant articles:
The question asks which provision provides power to Parliament to establish a new state. While Article 2 specifically mentions the "establishment of new States," Article 3 deals with the "formation of new States" by altering existing ones within the Union. Both articles provide Parliament with the power to create new states, albeit in different contexts (outside vs. inside the existing Union). Option 1 correctly identifies Article 2 & 3 together, reflecting the combined power of Parliament in creating new states, whether by admission, establishment from outside, or formation by altering existing states.
Therefore, the power to establish a new state or form a new state, encompassing both admitting territories and reorganizing existing ones, is primarily derived from Article 2 and Article 3 of the Constitution of India. Article 4 supports these actions by outlining the procedural consequences for the Schedules and clarifying that such laws are not constitutional amendments under Article 368.
| Article | Provision Summary | Relevance to New State Formation |
|---|---|---|
| Article 2 | Admission or establishment of new States. | Explicitly grants power to admit or establish new states (often from outside the Union). |
| Article 3 | Formation of new States and alteration of existing ones. | Grants power to form new states by altering the territories of existing states within the Union. |
| Article 4 | Laws under Articles 2 & 3 amend Schedules 1 & 4; not Article 368 amendments. | Supplements Articles 2 & 3 by detailing the procedural impact and nature of laws made under them. |
| Constitutional Article | Parliamentary Power |
|---|---|
| Article 2 | Admission into the Union or establishment of new States. |
| Article 3 | Formation of new States, alteration of areas, boundaries, or names of existing States. |
| Article 4 | Laws under Articles 2 & 3 amend Schedules I and IV and are not treated as constitutional amendments under Article 368. |
While Articles 2 and 3 grant the power, the process for forming a new state or altering an existing one is also outlined. For laws under Article 3, a Bill can only be introduced in Parliament on the recommendation of the President. Before recommending the Bill, the President has to refer it to the Legislature of the concerned State for expressing its views within a specified period. However, Parliament is not bound by the views of the State Legislature. This highlights the centralisation of power with the Union Parliament in matters of state reorganisation.
Laws made under Article 2 do not require prior reference to State Legislatures as they deal with territories not part of the existing states of the Union.
Both types of laws are passed by a simple majority in Parliament, reinforcing the provision in Article 4 that they are not amendments under Article 368, which requires a special majority.
"Separate Electorate system" was introduced in which Act?
What is the significance of the civil rights movement in the USA that was carried on between 1954-1968?
What does BAMCEF stand for?
Which one of the is not the power of Parliament?
Which one of these is not a Pressure group ?