Which one of the is not the power of Parliament?
Can impose any language in the state.
Let's examine the powers of the Indian Parliament concerning states and their attributes. The question asks which of the listed actions is not a power of the Parliament.
We will analyze each option based on the constitutional provisions relating to the Parliament's powers, particularly concerning the formation and alteration of states:
This statement refers to the Parliament's power under Article 3 of the Constitution of India. Article 3 explicitly grants Parliament the power to increase or diminish the area of any state. Therefore, this is a valid power of the Parliament.
This power is also covered under Article 3 of the Constitution. Parliament has the authority to change the name of any state. This is another power of the Parliament.
The Constitution of India deals with official languages in Part XVII. While the Constitution specifies official languages of the Union and allows states to adopt their own official language(s), it does not grant Parliament the power to unilaterally impose a specific language on a state against its will. Language policy is an area where states have significant autonomy. Parliament can make laws regarding official languages of the Union or for communication between states and the Union, but imposing a language within a state's internal affairs is generally outside its power.
Similar to changing areas, Article 3 of the Constitution empowers Parliament to alter the boundaries of any state. This is a fundamental power related to the territorial organization of India.
Based on the analysis, the power to impose any language within a state is not a power granted to the Parliament under the Constitution.
| Action | Is it a Power of Parliament? |
|---|---|
| Increase area of any state | Yes |
| Decrease area of any state | Yes |
| Change name of any state | Yes |
| Change boundaries of any state | Yes |
| Impose any language in the state | No |
Therefore, the statement that is not a power of the Parliament is that it "Can impose any language in the state."
| Parliamentary Power | Constitutional Basis (Relevant) |
|---|---|
| Formation of new states | Article 3 |
| Alteration of areas, boundaries, or names of existing states | Article 3 |
| Legislation on official languages of the Union or communication between Union and states | Articles 343-351 (Part XVII) |
| Imposing a language within a state's internal affairs | Not a power |
Part XVII of the Indian Constitution deals with Official Language. It provides for the official language of the Union and allows states to adopt one or more languages used in the state or Hindi as their official language(s). The Constitution respects the linguistic diversity of India and the autonomy of states in choosing their official language(s). While Parliament has powers related to the official languages of the Union, it cannot dictate the official language(s) of a state or impose a specific language on a state.
"Separate Electorate system" was introduced in which Act?
Which provision of Constitution provide power to parliament to establish a new state?
What is the significance of the civil rights movement in the USA that was carried on between 1954-1968?
What does BAMCEF stand for?
Which one of these is not a Pressure group ?