Which one of the following measures of central tendency is used in construction of index numbers?
Geometric mean
Index numbers are statistical measures used to track changes in a variable or group of variables over time or across different locations. They are particularly useful for comparing relative changes rather than absolute values. When constructing index numbers, especially those that aggregate price or quantity changes of multiple items, a suitable measure of central tendency is required to represent the overall change.
An index number often summarizes the price or quantity changes of several commodities. To get a single representative figure for the group's change, we need to average the individual changes. The choice of the measure of central tendency significantly impacts the resulting index number.
Let's look at the common measures of central tendency and their suitability for constructing index numbers:
Based on the characteristics required for averaging price and quantity relatives, the geometric mean is widely recognized and used in the construction of many standard index numbers, such as the Fisher's Ideal Index and certain types of average-of-relatives indices. Its ability to handle proportional changes makes it superior to arithmetic mean for this purpose and certainly more suitable than median or mode.
For example, if the price of item A increases by 100% (relative = 2) and item B decreases by 50% (relative = 0.5), the arithmetic mean of the relatives is $(2 + 0.5) / 2 = 1.25$, suggesting a 25% average increase. The geometric mean is $\sqrt{2 \times 0.5} = \sqrt{1} = 1$, suggesting no average change, which is a more balanced representation of opposing proportional changes.
Thus, the measure of central tendency most commonly used in the construction of index numbers is the geometric mean.
| Measure of Central Tendency | Suitability for Index Numbers | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Harmonic Mean | Less common for general index construction | More suitable for specific types of rates/ratios (e.g., speed, price per unit amount). |
| Geometric Mean | Most Suitable and Widely Used | Appropriate for averaging ratios/relatives; accounts for proportional changes; satisfies certain index number tests. |
| Median | Not suitable | Measure of position, not average of ratios/rates. |
| Mode | Not suitable | Measure of frequency, not average of ratios/rates. |
While geometric mean is preferred for averaging relatives, some index numbers (like the Laspeyres or Paasche price indices) implicitly use a form of weighted average of prices or quantities, which relates more to arithmetic means of values rather than geometric means of relatives directly. However, when explicitly averaging price/quantity relatives to construct an index, the geometric mean is the theoretically sounder choice for many applications because it handles multiplicative relationships inherent in ratios better.
Understanding index numbers is crucial in economics and statistics for measuring inflation, changes in industrial production, stock market movements, etc.
If X̅ = 20 is the mean of 10 observations x1, x2, ... x10; then what is the value of \(\displaystyle \sum_{i=1}^{10}\left(\frac{3 x_i-4}{5}\right) ?\) ?
What is the mean of the numbers 1, 2, 3, ... 10 with frequencies 9C0, 9C1, 9C2 ..., 9C9, respectively?
The mean of five numbers is 30. If one number is excluded, their mean becomes 28. The excluded number is
The ‘less than’ ogive curve and the ‘more than’ ogive curve intersect at
The observations 4, 1, 4, 3, 6, 2, 1, 3, 4, 5, 1, 6 are outputs of 12 dices thrown simultaneously. If m and M are means of lowest 8 observations and highest 4 observations respectively, then what is (2m + M) equal to ?