All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

Which one of the following approaches/markers would be typically used for discovering polymorphism between two closely related accessions of a crop plant?

The correct answer is GBS

Understanding Polymorphism in Crop Accessions

Polymorphism refers to the occurrence of two or more clearly different morphs or forms, also referred to as alternative phenotypes, in the same population of a species. In the context of molecular biology and genetics, polymorphism often refers to variations in DNA sequences among individuals or accessions within a species. Discovering these variations, or polymorphisms, is crucial for understanding genetic diversity, identifying useful traits, and breeding improved crop varieties. When comparing closely related accessions of a crop plant, the differences might be subtle, requiring sensitive and high-throughput methods to detect them effectively.

Comparing Molecular Marker Approaches

Various molecular marker techniques are used to detect polymorphism. Let's look at the options provided:

  • AFLP (Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism): This technique involves digesting DNA with restriction enzymes, ligating adapters, and then amplifying fragments using PCR. It detects multiple polymorphisms across the genome and is considered relatively high-throughput compared to older methods. However, it is technically demanding and detects dominant markers.
  • GBS (Genotyping-By-Sequencing): This is a next-generation sequencing-based method that combines genome complexity reduction with sequencing for discovering and genotyping single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and other variations simultaneously across numerous samples. It is highly multiplexed, high-throughput, and cost-effective for large-scale studies. GBS directly discovers new markers (like SNPs) across the genome, which is a major advantage for detecting polymorphism, especially in closely related individuals where SNP differences might be the primary source of variation.
  • SSR (Simple Sequence Repeats): Also known as microsatellites, these are regions of DNA with short, repeating sequences. Polymorphism is detected based on variations in the number of repeats. SSRs are often co-dominant markers and are highly polymorphic. However, they are locus-specific, requiring primer design for each locus, and are generally lower throughput than sequencing-based methods for genome-wide assessment.
  • RAPD (Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA): This PCR-based method uses short, arbitrary primers to amplify random segments of DNA. Polymorphism is detected based on the presence or absence of amplified fragments. RAPD markers are dominant and suffer from low reproducibility, making them less reliable for accurate polymorphism detection, especially in detailed genetic studies of closely related lines.

Selecting the Optimal Approach for Closely Related Accessions

For discovering polymorphism between two closely related accessions of a crop plant, the goal is often to find sufficient markers across the genome to differentiate them and understand their genetic relationship or variation. Closely related individuals share a large proportion of their genome, meaning the differences are likely to be subtle, possibly in the form of SNPs or small insertions/deletions.

GBS is particularly well-suited for this task because:

  • It is a high-throughput method that can interrogate many loci simultaneously.
  • It directly discovers SNPs and other sequence variations across the sampled genomic regions.
  • Being sequencing-based, it provides precise sequence information for detected polymorphisms.
  • It is cost-effective for genotyping large numbers of samples and discovering markers concurrently.

While AFLP can also detect multiple polymorphisms, GBS's ability to directly discover and genotype SNPs on a massive scale makes it more powerful and efficient for comprehensive polymorphism detection, especially when fine-scale differences need to be identified between closely related lines. SSRs are excellent polymorphic markers but are typically used for targeted genotyping after marker discovery. RAPD is generally not preferred due to reproducibility issues and the dominant nature of the markers.

Conclusion

Given the need to discover polymorphism between closely related accessions and the advantages of high-throughput marker discovery and genotyping, GBS (Genotyping-By-Sequencing) is typically the most appropriate and powerful approach among the options listed for this purpose.

Was this answer helpful?

Important Questions from Breeding

  1. Which of the following is an indigenous dairy breed of cattle?

  2. Given below are a few statements on use of plant breeding to develop improved varieties of a crop plant:

    A: Genotypic/phenotypic variation in the desired trait should be available in the germplasm resources of the crop plant.

    B: Availability of molecular markers linked to the trait of interest would decelerate the process of trait introgression into desired varieties.

    C: Breeding procedures to improve plant varieties are generally more successful among sexually compatible species as compared to sexually incompatible species.

    D: Co-dominant molecular markers cannot be used for selection of plants with the desired trait.

    Which of the above statement(s) is/are INCORRECT?

  3. Given below are some terms in column A and their corresponding properties/related terms in column B

    Column XColumn X
    ABulk segregant
    analysis
    (i)QTL analysis of wider genetic diversity using fewer individuals
    BNILS(ii)Mapping monogenic qualitative trails
    CAssociation mapping(iii)Co-dominant markers
    D SNPs(iv)Repeated backcrossing of F1 to recurrent parent
    Which one of the following options represents the most appropriate match between all terms of column A and B?
  4. A group of researchers are testing two new agents, M1 and M2 for their efficacy in selecting transgenic plants. When they performed tissue culture experiments using three explants, A, B, and C without Agrobacterium transformation, and selected the regenerated plants on M1 and M2, the following regeneration frequencies were obtained.

    Regeneration frequencies (%) in presence of different concentration of agents
    Explant typeM1 conc. (mg/L)M2 conc. (mg/L)
    2060100101520
    A44%21%Nil8%NilNil
    B53%30%10%NilNilNil
    C71%42%18%15%9%4%

    Based on the above data, which one of the following conclusions is INCORRECT?

  5. Which one of the following options best represents the sequence of events leading to the phenomenon of introgression?

Need Expert Advice?

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App