Which of the following statements is correct about Goddess Sri Lakshmi? A. The Ravanavaha attributed to Vakataka King Pravarasena II speaks of Sri Lakshmi as pralayagrhini. B. The Bhitari inscription refers to Vishnu as one who is the permanent abode of Lakshmi. C. Harsha frequently refers to Sri Lakshmi in the Ratnavali D. The Gwalior stone inscription speaks of Vishnu and Sri Lakshmi, E. Sita is identified with Lakshmi in the Harivamsa and the Vishnudharmottara Purana.
A, D and E only
The question asks us to identify the correct statements regarding Goddess Sri Lakshmi based on various ancient Indian texts and inscriptions. Let's examine each statement carefully.
The Ravanavaha, also known as Setubandha, is an epic poem in Maharashtri Prakrit composed by King Pravarasena II of the Vakataka dynasty. This text is known for its vivid descriptions and literary merit. Historical and literary analysis confirms that the Ravanavaha does indeed refer to Goddess Sri Lakshmi using the epithet 'pralayagrhini'. This term translates to something like 'the wife of the cosmic dissolution' or 'mistress of destruction', highlighting Lakshmi's connection to Vishnu, who is involved in the cosmic cycle including dissolution, and her encompassing divine power beyond just prosperity.
Therefore, Statement A is correct.
The Bhitari pillar inscription is primarily associated with the Gupta emperor Skandagupta. It recounts his military achievements and his devotion, often focusing on Vishnu. While Vishnu is widely considered the abode of Lakshmi (Vaikuntha being their divine dwelling), the specific phrasing "permanent abode of Lakshmi" in the Bhitari inscription is not a commonly cited feature of this particular text. The inscription praises Vishnu's power and attributes but doesn't seem to contain this specific theological description of Vishnu in relation to Lakshmi as his permanent abode in these exact words.
Therefore, Statement B is likely incorrect.
Ratnavali is a Sanskrit drama composed by King Harsha. It is a romantic comedy centered around the love story of King Udayana and Princess Ratnavali. While plays of this era often include invocations to deities, the Ratnavali is not a devotional text and does not feature frequent or central references to Goddess Sri Lakshmi. The narrative focuses on courtly life, romance, and political intrigue rather than extensive theological discussions or frequent mentions of deities like Lakshmi.
Therefore, Statement C is incorrect.
Several inscriptions have been found in Gwalior. A notable one is the Gwalior inscription of the Pratihara ruler Mihira Bhoja. This inscription, dating to the 9th century CE, records the construction of a temple dedicated to Vishnu-Narayana and Lakshmi-Narayani. It praises the deities and details the lineage and actions of the king. Therefore, Gwalior stone inscriptions do indeed speak of both Vishnu and Sri Lakshmi.
Therefore, Statement D is correct.
In Vaishnava theology, the consorts of Vishnu's avatars are often considered manifestations of Goddess Lakshmi. Sita, the consort of Rama (an avatar of Vishnu), is traditionally identified with Lakshmi. This identification is clearly stated or implied in various Puranic texts and epics. Both the Harivamsa (an appendix to the Mahabharata dealing with the life of Krishna, another Vishnu avatar) and the Vishnudharmottara Purana are significant Vaishnava texts that discuss avatars and their consorts, including the identification of Sita with Lakshmi.
Therefore, Statement E is correct.
Based on the analysis, the correct statements are:
Statements A, D, and E are factually correct based on the content of the mentioned texts and inscriptions related to Goddess Sri Lakshmi and Lord Vishnu. Statements B and C contain inaccuracies regarding the specific content of the Bhitari inscription and Harsha's Ratnavali concerning frequent references to Sri Lakshmi.
Thus, the combination of correct statements is A, D, and E.
| Text/Inscription | Attribution/Period | Reference to Lakshmi / Vishnu | Statement in Question | Correctness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ravanavaha (Setubandha) | Vakataka King Pravarasena II | Refers to Lakshmi as 'pralayagrhini' | A | Correct |
| Bhitari Inscription | Gupta Emperor Skandagupta | Focuses on Skandagupta's achievements and devotion to Vishnu; does not explicitly phrase Vishnu as 'permanent abode of Lakshmi' | B | Incorrect |
| Ratnavali | King Harsha | Romantic drama; not focused on frequent Lakshmi references | C | Incorrect |
| Gwalior Stone Inscription | e.g., Pratihara Mihira Bhoja | Mentions Vishnu and Lakshmi (Narayana-Narayani) | D | Correct |
| Harivamsa and Vishnudharmottara Purana | Ancient Vaishnava Texts | Identify Sita as an incarnation of Lakshmi | E | Correct |
Understanding ancient Indian history and religious beliefs often relies on studying various sources, including:
These sources collectively help reconstruct the religious landscape of ancient India, including the evolution and understanding of deities like Goddess Sri Lakshmi and Lord Vishnu across different periods and regions.
Gurjara-Prathiharas originally came to the Indian subcontinent from:
Gupta emperor Chandragupta II was known by which other following name/s?
(A) Devagupta
(B) Devaraja
(C) Devaputra
(D) Devavrata
Choose the correct answer from the options give below:
In which of the following periods first stupas in India came into being:
Harshavardhana, king of Kanauj ruled for
______ spent a lot of time at Harshavardhana's court and left a detailed account of what he saw.