(i) Indo-Aryans are the last immigirants into India.
(ii) This group was the next to come to India after the Negritos.
(iii) This group have come into India between 2000 and 1500 BC.
This section delves into the historical context of migrations into India, evaluating the statements concerning the Indo-Aryan people, who are sometimes linked to the Nordic racial classification theories.
In the study of ancient Indian history and population movements, the arrival of Indo-Aryan speaking groups is often considered one of the later significant migrations into the subcontinent. While subsequent migrations and population shifts have occurred throughout history, the Indo-Aryans represent a major ethnolinguistic influx that shaped ancient India. Within the context of foundational population layers, they are frequently positioned as among the final large-scale migrating groups preceding later historical developments. Thus, this statement is often considered accurate in broad historical perspectives.
Historical and archaeological evidence suggests that the Negritos were among the very first inhabitants of the Indian subcontinent. However, the sequence of subsequent migrations is complex. Following the Negritos, other groups like the Proto-Australoids and later the Dravidian speakers are believed to have arrived. The Indo-Aryans arrived considerably later than the Negritos. Stating they were the immediate successors ("next to come") overlooks the potential presence and migration of other groups, such as the Dravidians, in the interim. Consequently, this statement is generally regarded as inaccurate.
The timing of the Indo-Aryan migration into India is a subject of scholarly discussion, but a widely accepted timeframe places their arrival in the northwestern part of the subcontinent between approximately $2000$ BC and $1500$ BC. This period coincides with significant cultural changes, including the late Harappan civilization and the early Vedic period. Therefore, this statement aligns with established historical estimates.
Evaluating the statements based on historical consensus:
Consequently, statements (i) and (iii) are identified as accurate based on the provided context and historical understanding.
Polygynous family is represented by
The following are the archealogical sources of Indian history :
(a) Stone inscriptions
(b) Copper plates
(c) Leaf inscriptions
(d) Pillar inscriptions
Select the correct answer -
Regarding the Indus Valley Civilization, consider the following statements:
1) It was predominantly a secular civilization and the religious element, though present, did not dominate the scene.
2) During this period, cotton was used for manufacturing textiles in India.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Whom did the Greeks call "Amritaghat" which means slayer of enemies?
King Kharavela, the ancient Indian king whose biography is found in the famous Hathigumpha inscription, ruled from: