This solution identifies the incorrect statement regarding the nature and function of boundaries by analyzing each option.
Boundaries are fundamentally political constructs. They are established through political agreements, treaties, and conflicts, serving political functions like defining sovereignty, managing resources, and controlling movement between states. Thus, the assertion that boundaries are purely political in origin and function is accurate.
A boundary serves as a line separating distinct political or geographical entities. In contrast, centrifugal forces are factors that operate *within* a state or region, promoting division, disintegration, or separatism (examples include strong regional identities or ethnic tensions). While such forces might influence the creation or contestation of boundaries, the boundary itself is a line of demarcation *between* entities, not the manifestation of an internal divisive force.
Therefore, the statement "Boundary is a manifestation of centrifugal force" is incorrect because it misrepresents the nature of a boundary as an outcome or line of separation, rather than an internal divisive force.
The statement that the Eastern Sector boundary between India and China is commonly known as the McMohan line is factually correct. This historical boundary demarcation is widely recognized.
Boundaries are not natural features but are deliberately created by humans. They are conceptualized, selected, defined, and demarcated through human actions, often following existing political intentions or sometimes physical geography. Hence, the description of boundaries as artificial is correct.
By examining the definitions and functions of political boundaries and centrifugal forces, it is clear that the statement identifying a boundary as a manifestation of centrifugal force is inaccurate.
Morgenthau's principles of political realism are:
A. Politics is rooted in permanent and unchanging human nature which is basically self centred, self-regarding and self-interested
B. Politics is an autonomous sphere of action and cannot therefore be reduced to morals
C. International Politics is an arena of conflicting self-interests
D. The ethics of international relations is situational ethics which is very different from private morality
Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
Who among the following political thinkers consider the anarchical self help system to be a compelling factor for States to maximise their relative power positions?