Which of the following sections of Companies Act, 2013 facilitates amalgamation, absorption and reconstruction of companies? 1. 319 2. 320 3. 410 4. 502
1
The question asks us to identify the section in the Companies Act, 2013 that facilitates amalgamation, absorption, and reconstruction of companies. These processes involve combining companies or restructuring a single company.
Let's look at the provided options and analyze which one relates to these complex corporate restructuring activities based on the question and the indicated correct answer.
We need to find the section that specifically covers amalgamation, absorption, and reconstruction. Based on the correct answer provided, Section 319 is the relevant section.
Section 319 of the Companies Act, 2013, deals with the "Power of liquidator to accept shares, etc., as consideration for sale of property of company". While the primary focus might seem narrow, this section is related to winding up and how assets are dealt with during that process. Sometimes, in schemes of amalgamation or reconstruction, a company being wound up might transfer its assets to another company in exchange for shares or other consideration. Therefore, this section can be seen as facilitating certain aspects that might arise during or as a result of reconstruction or amalgamation, particularly in the context of a company being liquidated or wound up as part of the scheme.
Considering the options and the specific phrasing of the question about facilitating amalgamation, absorption, and reconstruction, and focusing on the provided correct answer, Section 319 addresses a mechanism that can be part of a corporate restructuring process, especially when winding up is involved.
| Section | Primary Subject | Relevance to Amalgamation/Reconstruction |
|---|---|---|
| 319 | Power of liquidator to accept shares, etc., as consideration for sale of property of company | Facilitates asset transfer during winding up, often part of reconstruction/amalgamation. |
| 320 | Power of Company to Make Arrangement with its Creditors and Members | Enables arrangements, which can be part of broader schemes. |
| 410 | Constitution of NCLAT | Provides appellate forum for restructuring matters, but doesn't facilitate the process directly. |
| 502 | Meeting of creditors in voluntary winding up | Part of winding up, which may follow restructuring, not the process itself. |
Based on the analysis focusing on the provided options and the section indicated as correct, Section 319 deals with the power of a liquidator to accept consideration other than cash, such as shares, when selling the company's assets during winding up. This specific power is a mechanism that can be employed within the broader context of a reconstruction or amalgamation scheme, especially if the scheme involves the dissolution of one of the entities and the transfer of its assets to another in exchange for shares in the latter company.
Therefore, among the given options, Section 319 is the section that facilitates a component relevant to amalgamation, absorption, and reconstruction processes, particularly in winding-up scenarios.
| Section | Description | Chapter |
|---|---|---|
| Section 230 | Power to compromise or make arrangements with creditors and members | Chapter XV (Compromises, Arrangements and Amalgamations) |
| Section 232 | Merger and amalgamation of companies | Chapter XV (Compromises, Arrangements and Amalgamations) |
| Section 304 | Circumstances in which company may be wound up by Tribunal | Chapter XX (Winding Up) |
| Section 319 | Power of liquidator to accept shares, etc., as consideration for sale of property of company | Chapter XX (Winding Up) |
Amalgamation, absorption, and reconstruction are methods used for corporate restructuring. They involve combining two or more companies or changing the structure of an existing company. These processes are governed by detailed provisions in the Companies Act, 2013, primarily under Chapter XV (Compromises, Arrangements, and Amalgamations), but related provisions in other chapters, such as Winding Up (Chapter XX), can also come into play depending on the specific scheme.
These processes require approval from the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and often involve meetings of shareholders and creditors, valuations, and regulatory compliance.
Given below are two statements, one labelled as Assertion (A) and the other labeled as Reason (R). Read the statements and choose the correct answer using the code given below.
Assertion (A): Consumers need to be given legal protection against certain trade practices and business methods.
Reason (R): Protection as per market forces and 'Caveat Emptor' is not enough as perfectly competitive market is an economist's dream and consumer sovereignty is a myth.
According to FEMA, foreign exchange does NOT include
1. Deposits payable in any foreign currency
2. Bills of exchange drawn in Indian currency but payable in any foreign currency
3. Traveller's cheques drawn by institutions outside India but payable in Indian currency
4. Drafts drawn by banks outside India and payable in foreign currency
Which of the following laws does not affect business organizations?
Which of the following statements is not correct relating to consumerism ?